hell no otherwise I wouldn't have made this thread lol. Only thing hykem released was 1000s of members from the gbatemp community.
I think that's a good example of the issue here for the forum mods.
Hykem has delivered countless times on various hacking scenes, so it's very likely his hack is real. So then, as a mod, what rules are you going to enforce? What is a troll, and what is a legit project that has been delayed? If someone on GBATemp said that Hykem is a troll, the resulting shame would be on GBATemp for banning one of the guys who has released some of the most critical exploits on many consoles in the past few years.
Conversely, if you say "we don't ban XXXX because he has released stuff in the past", how is that fair for newer hackers who haven't released anything yet, are trying really hard, but in the end run into problems they hadn't foreseen?
In other words, how can the mods make a difference between a troll and an honest guy who made a mistake? In general, they can't.
There are also trolls who are very advanced: these guys sometimes release useful stuff, other times pretend they'll release something that never happens. Do you ban those guys even though you know that once in a while they release cool stuff?
I've also met lots of people who were initially just trolls, or trying to get credit on top of other people's work (e.g. releasing a simple hexedited mod of a Custom Firmware and claiming it to be their own). Turn out that by doing so, these guys got to learn a bit about custom firmwares, and released their own stuff later on. Wouldn't it be a shame for the community if such a guy was banned and not given an opportunity to learn, grow, then give back?
Bottom line is, it's tough on many aspects to be 100% certain that banning someone like that is going to be beneficial for the community long term.