- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Messages
- 416
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 33
- Location
- That place you call ''Home''
- XP
- 207
- Country
That is actually NOT why the report button is there. It is NOT there so that you can judge what other people might possibly find offensive, it's so you can report stuff that YOU find offensive. Basically it seems that nobody actually had a problem with it, but you took it upon yourself to decide what others could find offensive. Why don't you just let people speak for themselves?snip
I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...
I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...
That is actually NOT why the report button is there. It is NOT there so that you can judge what other people might possibly find offensive, it's so you can report stuff that YOU find offensive. Basically it seems that nobody actually had a problem with it, but you took it upon yourself to decide what others could find offensive. Why don't you just let people speak for themselves?snip
I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...
I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...
Reminds me of South Park:
"I like to think we speak for the children." - Stephen Spielberg
"But we're the children!" - Children
Forum Rules said:Use the report function! If you see someone breaking a rule, report it. Don't reply to a post you've just reported and don't write an essay for the report reason but DO make it clear why it should be removed.
see:
"'Well kids can see worse thing in other places!' isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places. It is about THIS place..."
I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...
I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...
see:
"'Well kids can see worse thing in other places!' isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places. It is about THIS place..."
I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...
I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...
Really, whether the picture was there or not (Even though it was small as all hell), SHOULD you be viewing THIS site at work at all? And if you were allowed, chances are that the boss won't care if some person on the internet has a small avatar of a beautiful actress. Yes, "kids see worse" is a stupid argument, but it's true. Chances are if you're seeing this, then you're either at home, or at a friends place. In which case you see much worse just turning on Family Channel. If it was a big signature or something, then sure, it'd be understandable, but the avatars dimensions were small.
If we're talking about this forum being suitable for all ages and such, why are we allowed to swear? I mean, I understand the rule against NSFW material and such, since that is different. But when THE RULES say "suitable for all ages"(Or something of the sort), it doesn't make sense since we're still allowed to swear and we probably do swear here.
Just pointing that out.
First of all I don't see how a rule was broken. Secondly once again YOU are defining what is "questionable." Nobody else seemed to think it was questionable or else they would have reported it themselves. People walk around in public with hardly any clothes on but no one makes laws banning that just because some people have to "take extra steps if they don't want to see it." There is no "fact" that it doesn't belong here, there is your personal opinion that it doesn't belong here.That is actually NOT why the report button is there. It is NOT there so that you can judge what other people might possibly find offensive, it's so you can report stuff that YOU find offensive. Basically it seems that nobody actually had a problem with it, but you took it upon yourself to decide what others could find offensive. Why don't you just let people speak for themselves?snip
I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...
I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...
Reminds me of South Park:
"I like to think we speak for the children." - Stephen Spielberg
"But we're the children!" - Children
Forum Rules said:Use the report function! If you see someone breaking a rule, report it. Don't reply to a post you've just reported and don't write an essay for the report reason but DO make it clear why it should be removed.
This was not an ass for the sake of education. It was an ass for the sake of an ass. I like Eva Mendes. I like her ass. But I can also recognize that questionable images have no place out in the open for all to see. There is no problem with OPs first post since it is marked NSFW and put in a spoiler. In a sig/avatar though, it's out there for all to see and forces other members to take extra steps if they don't want to see it.
P.S. I'm not speaking for anyone else. I'm speaking for myself. I'm not personally offended by the image but the fact remains that it does not belong here.
P.P.S. You spelled Steven Spielberg's name wrong...
snip
I know you'd like to think that, but that actually wasn't it at all. I could explain, but no matter what I say, you'd just think I was lying, so it'd be a waste of my time, and yours.Of all the pictures of Eva Mendes floating around on the interwebs, why did he pick that one? Could it possibly have something to do with the fact that her ass was hanging out?
Should I have PM'd you with the correction?
I know you'd like to think that, but that actually wasn't it at all. I could explain, but no matter what I say, you'd just think I was lying, so it'd be a waste of my time, and yours.Of all the pictures of Eva Mendes floating around on the interwebs, why did he pick that one? Could it possibly have something to do with the fact that her ass was hanging out?