What is your definition of NSFW?

My definition is Xuphor's pic of that pig in the EoF.
I mean of course that was safe for work

 

NSFW = Me.

 

as long as the picture(s) you're looking at or what you're reading doesn't involve nudity, violence, or anything bad, it's safe for work. you shouldn't be browsing NSFW stuff at work.

 

See, that's the problem. If people start posting NSFW stuff here, then others won't be able to browse GBAtemp while at work.
Which is part of why we try to keep it to a minimum, and tag most anything that is NSFW.

 

I assume THAT isn't the case. If I had a strict boss i'm pretty damn sure doing anything but work would piss them off.
If not the internet doesn't exist to cater to people slacking at work anyways. You go on the internet, you accept the risk.

 

I never said I agree with that, I think it's a idiotic rule personally (hence why I always have edgy avatars/signatures), I'm just saying HOW. IT. IS.

 

Well, I guess my sig was also removed even tho when I asked if it was ok to have put that sig on this forum and was told it was ok (it was around last year), guess the rules changed.

 

I don't think it offended anyone. It's probably because your boss man/lady thinks that the company might be looked at differently if people saw you with that that sig and saw that you worked for the company... :/

 

I would say NSFW = anything over PG 13. Keep work professional

 

That picture...is just great...
But yeah I would say NSFW

 

NSFW is a variable term in my honest oppinion.

However, generally most of 4chans boards are NSFW. Even /vp/ and /v/, hell any of the safe one's are even NSFW at times.

 

I reported your sig. I didn't report it because I found it personally offensive. I reported it because it involved nudity/see-through-panties. I've reported many sigs/avatars that involve questionable images just as everyone else should be doing (that is why there is a "report" button). People here think they need to push every rule to the limit... This is supposed to be a "friendly" community. It is supposed to be "SFW". Saying, "Well kids can see worse things in other places!" isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places, it is about THIS place. It's sad when it gets to the point that you have to block everyone's sigs/avatars when visiting a forum...

I'd have posted much sooner in this topic but seeing the title "What is your definition of NSFW" led me to believe it was either a troll thread or that tagzard started it...

 

It can vary per person. He found it disturbing and NSFW. You didn't. You have to deal with it.

To be blunt here, you're not even supposed to be searching for stuff like that while working anyways. I don't even get why there's an acronym "Not Safe For Work" when it's more accurate as "Not For Work." If you're on a porn site, it's both NSFW and NFW. But if you're viewing images of hot actresses with their hot panties, then that's NFW. People may argue it as SFW, but they really can't argue whether it's NFW or FW. It's NFW; you're not supposed to be viewing those kinds of stuff while working (unless your job has something to do with it ).

 

I have not idea what you just said there with all the NFW SFW NSFW FW NW SW stuff but just to clarify:

 

You were staring at her panties for way too long if you found some see-through effect to 'em.
I just stared at her ass and still see nothing NSFW about it, really.

 

New South F*%^$ Wales *





* joke for Australians.

 

A nuclear explosion.

 

Everyone has their own opinion whether they think it's "NSFW". I would consider something overly gory, or something a little bit over partial nudity. What I find ironic is, it's OK for someone to go to the beach, and find chicks with bikinis on, than to maybe see one on a magazine or an image.

 

Something sexually enticing visually that may seem questionable when seen by your boss?
Lol

 

see:
"'Well kids can see worse thing in other places!' isn't a valid argument here. This isn't about other places. It is about THIS place..."