Wait..GTA: ChinaTown Wars DOES have Online Co-Op?

[Rock Raiyu]

A few months ago, it was thought that ChinaTown Wars would have online co-op but was dismissed due to misunderstanding. But the GTA:CTW website confirms otherwise.

- All new replay feature allows you to replay all of your favorite missions
- Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection means head-to-head and co-op multiplayer mayhem
- Stat tracking and leaderboards that track your criminal career
- Epic storyline with tons of side-missions, addictive mini-games and hidden collectibles

Is this another mistake on there part or is this the real deal? Let's hope so..

News Source: GoNintendo

 

[CockroachMan]

Woah.. if this is true..

I used to play the first GTA on LAN with friends, great times.

 

[War]

I'm thinking it's just a mistake, but I don't want to sound too pessimistic.

 

[ChaosBoi]

Even if there is online co-op, how would co-op work (Please excuse me, since I don't keep up to date with GTA stuff)?

 

[Brian117]

When it says Nintendo WiFi, that can still mean Locally.

It doesn't mean Worldwide like we think it means.

But let's all hope and dream.

 

[tjas]

When it says nintendo wifi up till now the ment online wifi connection..

 

[Brian117]

Sorry, what?

 

[tinymonkeyt]

actually, this HAS been posted before
its the same thing as last times
we all assumed wifi meant online and were really happy
until someone clarified for us that wifi didnt always mean online...

 

[Rock Raiyu]

actually, this HAS been posted before
its the same thing as last times
we all assumed wifi meant online and were really happy
until someone clarified for us that wifi didnt always mean online...

Yeah I know, I was the one that posted it but then it was updated saying that it was a misunderstanding. But now its back again..

 

[Dwight]

Interesting...
Well, I guess we'll find out for sure in a few weeks.

 

[shakirmoledina]

gta can't do silly mistakes, atleast not at this point

 

[imz]

I highly doubt there will be wi-fi, I just don't want to get my hopes up as this is probably just the same mistake again