Looking at GBAtemp, I never would've guessed Obama's approval ratings plummeted. My vote is a secret, as I like to not start arguments over nothing.![]()

Yeah, because tax cuts are the key to lowering a deficit.Looking at GBAtemp, I never would've guessed Obama's approval ratings plummeted. My vote is a secret, as I like to not start arguments over nothing.![]()
You have to factor in the average age here and then it makes more sense. People even considering voting for Obama again is a joke. I'm not sure if he even has one accomplishment (running up trillions in debt doesn't count) besides "taking out osama", but that's hardly noteworthy. The military deserves credit there. Not the worst president, but he comes pretty damn close. I could go on and on about his failures. The blaming Bush thing should have only lasted the first two years at max. He could get another term and still be blaming bush on his eighth year, sh*t gets real old.
But if he wins again, won't be too surprised. All he has to do is sing, do a wink-wink, and do that white teeth sparkle, and he'll have the late teen early twenty vote again. All you have to do is take one economics class (with a professor teaching it that isn't on weed) and it'll be clear to vote conservative this time.
Herman Cain was my man, (his speeches were porn to me) but his dick may have gotten in trouble. So going with Romney I guess.
Yeah. Obamas gonna get extra votes cuz he was president when Osama bin Laden was killed. And cuz the media said that he was the one who organized it. In reality, spies found were he was hiding, then Obama said "ok. So let's send in the SEALs and get him." the seals did all the tactical work and actually aimed and pulled the trigger.


The deficit was a beast after bush left, but it wasn't impossible to deal with. Obama went ahead and supersized it to the max, so at this point it's uncontrollable. Inflation has already occurred quite noticeably in the last few months (been to grocery stores).
The current system is very unstable to say the least. Luckily China hasn't been pulling our chains yet, but there's no guarantee they won't in the future since they own so much of our debt.

Obama appointed Bernanke, so yes he deserves a lot of the blame. But we better lay off this, we're getting pretty off topic. I could ramble about inflation and the fed for hoursI agree, the Fed is and was the problem all along since they set up shop in 1913. I am not blaming Obama he is just a puppet that reads the teleprompters and smiles and does what he is told.
No, but neither will Rick Sanctorum, lowering corporations tax rates to 0 will solve nothing. Neither will Mitt Romney, his tax plan will actually add to the deficit.in response to smile: Indeed. You do know small businesses make up the backbone of America's economy right? Obama's admininstration (and senate) have smothered small business growth, and gave them a very uncertain future with the ominous obamacare.
And don't tell me you're going to argue that Obama has tried to lower the deficit.

Obama appointed Bernanke, so yes he deserves a lot of the blame. But we better lay off this, we're getting pretty off topic. I could ramble about inflation and the fed for hoursI agree, the Fed is and was the problem all along since they set up shop in 1913. I am not blaming Obama he is just a puppet that reads the teleprompters and smiles and does what he is told.![]()
No, if corporations are taxed at 0, it won't matter, we will lose more money than it will bring in. Plus I don't think you understand that most government spending is no nonsense. Do you consider Medicare nonsense? What about the military? How about medicaid? Social security?I'm not sure if you understand things correctly. Government spending needs to be reduced, not have more income to fuel it. Tax cuts will help economy big time as long as nonsense government spending is cut.
Tax less, spend less benefits everyone.



