7.29 (taking the average angular resolution of one arc minute) but only if we don't move our eyes side to side. It all really depends on the screen size and viewing distance.The human eye can see up to 7 megapixel
7.29 (taking the average angular resolution of one arc minute) but only if we don't move our eyes side to side. It all really depends on the screen size and viewing distance.
http://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/
So yeah, 4K makes sense for PC monitors or cinemas, doesn't make much sense for a home TV. I am always a proponent of more megapixels but the extra bang is barely noticeable while the extra buck is considerable at the moment.
Wow, 4K TVs are going down in price. This LG 55" 4K UHDTV is only $1.600. I also saw a few Sony 4K TVs for around $2,000~. As a reference, my Sony 1080p 55NX720 was $1,600 two years ago.
When will you adapt Ultra High definition? I'd love to, but I already have a decent TV. And I wouldn't have anything that supports 4K. I don't think the Wii U supports UHD and that's the only console I plan on getting.
Don't really see the need for 4K PC monitors, since it would be too big for such a close distance.
I think 1440p is also known as Super HD, so... yes.Oh is HD like street fighter now?
No, it's 3840 x 2160.Its not that goofy 2K by 4K pixel ratio is it?