i wonder why you only pointed out who released the report and not who actually wrote it because i think the latter says a lot more about its credibilityThe audit was not created by the judge, but a judge is the one who issued the release.
i wonder why you only pointed out who released the report and not who actually wrote it because i think the latter says a lot more about its credibilityThe audit was not created by the judge, but a judge is the one who issued the release.
Then why is it that when they do recounts of the physical ballots the numbers given by the counting machines are accurate?Real fact, not from a biased fact checking site.
Michigan judge released forensic audit stating Dominion machines are designed for systemic fraud.
https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report
As described in the previous post, not only is there no evidence that there was any widespread election fraud, but we also have evidence that debunks claims about voting machine fraud. Try again.Real fact, not from a biased fact checking site.
Michigan judge released forensic audit stating Dominion machines are designed for systemic fraud.
https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/Then why is it that when they do recounts of the physical ballots the numbers given by the counting machines are accurate?
The antrim County report falsely claimed an 68% error rate in counting machines, which was actually human error that was corrected early on.
Despite the obvious misrepresentation of information, they hand counted the physical ballots. And guess what? The count was accurate to within 12 votes.
So if the votes were double checked physically to compare to the voting machine count, and that count was accurate, what does that say about this report?
Where is the evidence exactly? Some article that says so? It was plainly written how they got cases dismissed in Time magazine. I also have to remind you these are the same people who told you how fragile elections were in the country, then they did everything they could to make it worse in their favor. They also peddled a conspiracy theory about Russians/Trump for 4 years. Now they are silencing right wing voices, but not only them. They are also quietly silencing Socialists, unions and anyone who doesn't align with Biden's democrats.As described in the previous post, not only is there no evidence that there was any widespread election fraud, but we also have evidence that debunks claims about voting machine fraud. Try again.
I skimmed the article and it seems they are admitting to getting voting access to as many people as possible. Im ok with that.https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
We wont get to know the full extent of the truth, but this is what has been admitted too. It was painfully obvious there was a conspiracy to make sure Biden won. Not only did they cheat Trump, but they screwed Bernie while doing this too. Im tired of all the cognitive dissonance.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Where is the evidence exactly? Some article that says so? It was plainly written how they got cases dismissed in Time magazine. I also have to remind you these are the same people who told you how fragile elections were in the country, then they did everything they could to make it worse in their favor. They also peddled a conspiracy theory about Russians/Trump for 4 years. Now they are silencing right wing voices, but not only them. They are also quietly silencing Socialists, unions and anyone who doesn't align with Biden's democrats.
...or why you like saltine Crackers...
We have to read between the lines in order to see the truth. The days of the unbiased reporting is long gone, and now we live in a day of infotainment. When you read/watch articles from the left/right, you are most likely only getting half the truth or less, and the rest is spin.
Left: About half, and that's only really because places like CNBC decided to suck the cock of hedge funds recently.We have to read between the lines in order to see the truth. The days of the unbiased reporting is long gone, and now we live in a day of infotainment. When you read/watch articles from the left/right, you are most likely only getting half the truth or less, and the rest is spin.
Left: About half, and that's only really because places like CNBC decided to suck the cock of hedge funds recently.
Right: Far, far less than half. If there's such thing as less than 0% truth, it's that.
Just because both sides are flawed doesn't prevent one from being far fundamentally and objectively worse.
As 12 million Americans "know," the United States government is run by lizard people.
the only question now is ....Are they komodo dragon or Iguana?
Of course I've heard of controlled opposition. After the Capitol riots, everyone involved basically instantly accused everyone ELSE of being an antifa plant or something (which makes no sense, since antifa is literally just the ideology of anti-fascism- and even if it WAS an actual organization, it'd be the most disorganized one in existence), and Trump turned against the very rioters he had stirred up and encouraged just days before.Have you ever heard of controlled opposition? Where both sides are actually in cahoots, but are made to appear to be conflicting?
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Look up Spirit Science on YouTube, you will see that is false. It is actually allegedly Martians.
Of course I've heard of controlled opposition. After the Capitol riots, everyone involved basically instantly accused everyone ELSE of being an antifa plant or something (which makes no sense, since antifa is literally just the ideology of anti-fascism- and even if it WAS an actual organization, it'd be the most disorganized one in existence), and Trump turned against the very rioters he had stirred up and encouraged just days before.
>Trumpers do bad thingI do not know if we will ever really get this full story to this, or any other story for that matter. I have a feeling it could be a false flag event, while also having members of both sides (left and right) being involved in the attack. Bottom line, everyone who went in (and if there is found to be paid police letting people in) should all be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
>Trumpers do bad thing
"must be false flag"
>Dems have a 0.1% chance of having done bad thing
"definitely their fault and ONLY their fault"
it wasn't a false flag because y'all hardcore trumpnuts actually are that fervently batshit insane
dude, you've spouted countless conspiracies regarding democrats but refuse to admit trump's done basically anything wrongI have never been a trumper, just a constitutionalist. I would argue both sides are guilty of false flagging. The underhand is a bloody one.
dude, you've spouted countless conspiracies regarding democrats but refuse to admit trump's done basically anything wrong
"constitutionalist" is a shitty, oxymoronic (considering any given part of the constitution is one you only really care about when it benefits you and harms whoever disagrees with you) dogwhistle to hide just how far down the trump rabbit hole you've gone, and we all know it
Hoo boy you're quite the piece of work aren'tchaI have been saying for 25+ years that if you are into pedophilia, drugs, homosexuality, and/or prostitution... then Politics is the right job for you.