D
The relevant error code for a CDN ban is a 2137-7403 though.That's not a ban
Anyways, there have been some reports of people still being able to update their stuff despite being banned so I would believe not everyone got CDN bans.
Update on my post: just checked my Switch and tried to update it. Yep I managed to get a CDN ban.
View attachment 141495
I know people hate that TX is taking the work of others and putting it into a convenient package, but I hope in their next update they implement the method of directing telemetry accumulation to the SD card so the system won't send it to Nintendo upon online connectivity.uhmmm if we cant reduce the thelemetry, the "new" mode is pretty unless, the information will be send to nity when we go to OFW.
Thanks, that was an interesting read although it shouldn't be used as an excuse to freely pirate games.
Remember that video game about making video games? If you pirated it, you'd get piracy in game and you couldn't win? How many people decided to buy the game after that part so that they could continue? Is that number greater than zero? That number has to be greater than the number of people who would have bought it otherwise. Your conversions only need to be higher than the tiny amount who would have bought it and would have quit before that point. People who wouldn't quit will convert for sure. As long as the number of people who now decide it's worth it only after the piracy extended trial is larger than the number of people who would buy the game and quit early on, you make out better. If your game is good, this will be true.
The real way to combat piracy is 1) Make the non-pirated product better than a pirated version, and 2) Sell it at a reasonable price point. Why do people pay for Netflix and Hulu? You could pirate most of it. So why? It's because it's cheap and better.
Video games should be like this. Mario kart 8, pirataes get 50cc mode only and no leaderboards. Wake up video game industry. Nintendo is so stuck in 2002.
why was everybody SO JEALOUS of SX when everyone wants to copy the SX OS itself. they're the first, and they're gonna be the last. still the best cfw.
Video games should be like this. Mario kart 8, pirataes get 50cc mode only and no leaderboards. Wake up video game industry. Nintendo is so stuck in 2002.
Off topic but they taste extremely different. But the same thing you either love or hate either and or both. I can't stand Marmite..
I don't get why everything is so polarized all the time, as long as we have more options everyone should be happy. There's been way too much infighting with the Switch scene it's unreal.
FTP is the difference. As stealth is enabled by default there's no way to stuff up unless you manually go disable it, but why would you do that, and if you do it's your own fault. I know for me, being able to easily use FTP to transfer files and not have to remove the sdcard all the time or implement my own blocking rules in the router is way more convenient. Finding it hard to find something to complain about here but I guess the drama is all encompassing by this point
Show me where they touched you
- Add LayeredFS support
Are you excited about any upcoming Game Mods for switch games? Well, we are! To accommodate this we have added what is commonly referred to as "LayeredFS" support. In short what this allows you to do is override specific files from a game with modified copies that are loaded from your microSD's (ex)FAT partition.
Place your custom game files under the following locations on the microSD root:
- /sxos/titles/<titleid>/exefs/
- /sxos/titles/<titleid>/romfs/
We can't wait to see what cool mods the community will come up with!
Normally yes.I have a question about SX OS.
Ok,it's not creport but we know that SX OS support LayeredFS since 1.3 so.
What if I put creport from New SDFILE in sxos/titles/0100000000000036
It will make creport works on SX OS ? Like that the "Stealth 'not so good' mode" will be more secure and prevent ban.
Normally yes.
But what people don't understand is that creport is only for crashes. And that doesn't prevent a ban. A ban for homebrew, yes, for now, a ban for backup loading no.
And as I said, nor a dns, nor anything will completely be safe (except homebrews, they don't leave traces because of the rcm way of launching them) if you don't restore a backup. Which basically make it useless.
This can be easily replicated by simply setting a dns to block any *.nintendo.* except ctest and some others.
No creport only handle crashes (eg when your switch ask you to reboot).When you load XCI with the SX card emulation, creport will not make a log ? Because internet-based xci doesn't have a cert so it will be considered like a error, no ?
Or maybe it's another module that will do the telemetry jobs for logging error.
I've been doing this for a whileI have a question about SX OS.
Ok,it's not creport but we know that SX OS support LayeredFS since 1.3 so.
What if I put creport from New SDFILE in sxos/titles/0100000000000036
It will make creport works on SX OS ? Like that the "Stealth 'not so good' mode" will be more secure and prevent ban.
No creport only handle crashes (eg when your switch ask you to reboot).
Not having a cert while going online is asking for a ban.
Not sending anything too nintendo can be flaged. (not including crashes)
You may should be able to see log on your SD card. It's what creport do so ^^I've been doing this for a while
although I can't verify if it's working as intended or not, at least it doesn't break anything for me, so no harm for me to keep using this
but I haven't had any crashes since I did thatYou may should be able to see log on your SD card. It's what creport do so ^^
Its mostly off-hand stuff although I'd have to comb the thread again to see if someone submitted a report after the widespread CDN bans were being reported. I'm still confident it was a server-side change that just gave the impression of bans upgrading to CDN bans and not a manual process of upgrading all normally banned certs to CDN banned status but I'll continue monitoring the situation very closely.Oh, is this confirmed? I was under the impression that MOST of the people who claimed to be only banned and not superbanned are just people who haven't rechecked their ban recently, because they didn't know something new hapepned 4 days ago. Like here: