From Team Xecuter:

This new 2.6 BETA of SX OS adds full support for Nintendo Switch firmware 7.x, including ALL functionality you expect when using our product. We've been pioneering our own unique and proprietary solution for defeating any future firmware protection and we're quite happy with the results so far.

This release is marked as BETA because we changed things drastically under the hood to streamline future firmware updates and some things may inadvertently behave differently.

That does not mean it hasn't been vetted at all, so give it a shot today!

Of course, we haven't been sitting idly behind the scenes either. A lot of our development resources and attention has been dedicated to bringing SX OS to those "unhackable" switches. We are working hard to bring the SX OS experience to all of you who are stuck with an "unhackable" switch. Stay tuned for more news!

Download here: -REMOVED-

 

[ZachyCatGames]

The payload for Atmosphere and other solutions are signed with a PRIVATE KEY. Doesn't get any more "illegal" than that yet you all look the other way. The public key used in SX OS has been known widely for a while now. Double standard.

It’s not illegal to distribute shit that’s signed or encrypted with a key

also the key that Gateway is including is not widely publicly known, or at least it wasn’t until Gateway leaked it

 

[V-Temp]

Signing it with a private key makes it "illegal" using the moral logic applied elsewhere.

No one is applying a moral logic. Distributing a plain text key file is not the same as signing something with a private key.

 

[smf]

So no EUCD isn't set in stone.

But you shouldn't use that argument as a smokescreen to pretend the signature patches which allow pirated games to be run on the switch wouldn't be covered.

 

[Creatable]

The only logical fallacies here are his own, lol.

 

[xiaNaix]

The key is only visible in plaintext when using the unpacker.

 

[linuxares]

But you shouldn't use that argument as a smokescreen to pretend the signature patches which allow pirated games to be run on the switch wouldn't be covered.

They aren't made for it. It's just an by product.

 

[smf]

They aren't made for it. It's just an by product.

So now I know you're lying and so would the court.

 

[Creatable]

I suggest reading this Wikipedia article if you'd like to know more about why your lord and savior TX is banned from being linked here now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

The key is only visible in plaintext when using the unpacker.

 

[Deleted User]

The key is only visible in plaintext when using the unpacker.

Doesn't make your point anymore valid

 

[DeuX]

You got multiple? Can I ask how you do that?

As AnalogMan already shared, I'm using payload launcher homebrew

https://github.com/suchmememanyskill/Payload_Launcher

 

[Essasetic]

I can imagine Garyopa being incredibly pissed off about all of this.

 

[Purple_Heart]

https://github.com/suchmememanyskill/Payload_Launcher

can someone compile it for me my pc freezes every time i try it

 

[guitarheroknight]

I need to stop using Windows then

Actually no offense, but you need to stop being biased towards Atmosphere first. You are a moderator primary then there is everything else.

 

[linuxares]

So now I know you're lying and so would the court.

Let's have a discussion about illegal numbers somewhere else than this SXOS thread.

 

[Creatable]

can someone compile it for me my pc freezes every time i try it

https://github.com/suchmememanyskill/Payload_Launcher/releases

 

[Purple_Heart]

thx

 

[8BitWonder]

Signing it with a private key makes it "illegal" using the moral logic applied elsewhere.

How is that any different than what SX OS does, since their use of the key can ONLY be exposed by Heskin's unpacker, which apparently is not considered "illegal."

It's simple really.

The way SX OS bundles the key in plain-text leaves it open for anyone to extract or view it like hexkyz/naehrwert's scripts can.

The way Sept is signed leaves zero possibility of deriving the private key.

 

[smf]

I suggest reading this Wikipedia article if you'd like to know more about why your lord and savior TX is banned from being linked here now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

What about the illegal numbers used in sept? Aren't the seeds used in key derivation not also illegal for the same reason?

 

[Essasetic]

Let's have a discussion about illegal numbers somewhere else than this SXOS thread.

I can cook up a quick thread if you wish.

 

[linuxares]

Actually no offense, but you need to stop being biased towards Atmosphere first. You are a moderator primary then there is everything else.

I'm not, if I would be bias for the people that know me. It would be probably ReiNX then? Since I talk more with them? I still also use all 3 of them. I was one of the people that pre-ordered SX Pro before release from shop01media.