If ReSwitched are human, then treat them like humans just like the user submitted data. Neither ReSwitched nor the members here know the full truth behind bans so one party does not immediately dismiss the other. ReSwitched could have easily missed something which you agreed with me on when it comes to the SX Core. If they treated their ban list as a theory, then that would be more acceptable. But to tout their opinions as fact is just a fallacy. Just because they are the closest to gospel does not mean they are gospel which I am now restating for the fourth time. Treating them as such makes you close-minded and defensive of any information that would break the illusion.
10% is actually a laughable number that supports my point that most people do not use AIO packs. Its probably possible that every pack besides DeepSea has a lower number since DeepSea is one of the most well known legal packs to link and distribute. Furthermore, you and I both know that a download does not immediately translate to usage. I've personally had to download DeepSea several times with regards to troubleshooting. This is just like when SX OS bragged about its downloads rather than its sales.
See this is your problem. You continuously make assumptions. And do you know what happens when you assume? You make an ass out of you and me. But mostly yourself because that is not how logical conclusions are drawn. Because if you make assumptions out of me, I can make assumptions out of you and that leads nowhere. This is why I cited Occam's Razor earlier because I do not have to make as many assumptions as you to defend my point. There is merit to bans being random and we don't have full conclusive evidence to suggest Nintendo only bans in waves. For all we know, they could do both to further distract us from the truth. But if you have to assume that the data is submitted incorrectly just to make yourself feel better, then go ahead. All that means is you have no objective evidence to suggest the data is false.
As I said earlier, where there is smoke, there is fire. If ReSwitched truly has nothing to hide, then where is the user submitted data that they used for their ban list? Why create a channel instead of a private group message or server? Plus, we all know Atmosphere wasn't entirely developed in an entirely clean room. Yet you have the audacity to call me not fact-based? The guy who not only created the AutoRCM thread to debunk the myths the public held about it, the warez thread to assist everyone in understanding what is legal and what isn't, or the banning thread to organize the information in the community? Well then go right ahead and sift through those threads including the one with 200+ pages; I've long since provided the evidence to backup my claims. I already know you won't so try another counterargument.
The difference again is, that you can verify the claims from reswitched about what is send to nintendo by reversing the console.
To verify what people did before they get banned, you need to get a nand dump from them, and even then there is stuff that could be lost based on restores of backups, or stuff like report clearing.
This makes the one info worth more as the other because one can be verified independently by everyone with knowledge who is ready to put in the work.
Also what you are doing is creating a theory based on what users reported, which in itself is fine, and a valid first step to verify the truth, but this does not verify your theory, for that you would need to verify that Nintendo actually gets data about the usage of what you think leads to ban, which would allow us to prevent sending the information, and thus prevent bans through this.
I also never claimed that most people use an AIO package, so 10% is more then enough for the point I made about AIO packets and the knowledge requirement to run backups, which was that not everyone in the community who uses backups knows what they are getting to run them. Even if half of the downloads are users who know a lot or redownload them, it would still mean that 50% of people might have no idea what signature patches are, and what they need them for playing backups.
And even through they are often discouraged, there are also enough people who use video tutorials, because they prefer them personally, which rarely explain a lot of what is done.
So over multiple messages I'm now giving you examples why users might not always have enough knowledge to fully understand your survey, which can lead to some errors in the reports.
I also multiple time told you, that we don't need any big number of reports or the reports themself at all from reswitched, since their main source for the ban reasons is not the user reports, and instead what they did after, by verifying stuff in the system.
But lets talk numbers, I checked your spreadsheet, filtered out all people who did something that is known to lead to bans, and then filtered out usage before atmosphere got its fatal implementation, since we know that lead to some telemetry send to nintendo that caused problems, especially when homebrew lead to it.
With all these filtered, I'm left with exactly 13 people without eshop access since 2018 out of all your 587 reports (and 337 people with an eshop ban). So 2,21% of all reports, or 3.86% of the eshop banned people have not done anything directly problematic.
Out of those 13 people 10 have a Y in layered FS usage, means they likely used mods, which depending on the game can also lead to bans, so we are left with 3 people, or 0.51% of the total/0.9% of the banned people have done nothing problematic, based on their own reporting.
For me this is pretty much the margin of error, and we would have much more reported bans if your theory about random bans for homebrew only CFW users where correct. Especially since homebrew only users are likely more intersted in tinkering with their system, and thus more likely to be intersted in reporting their bans.
I also don't see any questions about using cheats online in your survay, which is another know thing that can lead to bans.
As metnioned, its fine to collect data, and it can be helpfull to see if soemthing is wrong/missing, but with this data, its far away from you proving that just CFW usage leads randomly to a ban, when, depending on what you use as a base, the sample size of people and switches I know are running CFW online for years is bigger or nearly as big as your sampel size of data of random people reporting they might not have done something problematic.
I also have no idea how its relevant for the discussion about bans werether or not atmosphere was developed fully clean room or not, which btw. will not even give you 100% protection in terms of the law, depending on where on the globe you arem its just the potentially safest way.
I also still don't understand your obsession with a private channel on reswitched. This makes me more think that you have a big bias against reswitched, instead of just being critical of them, otherwise you would not be so focussed on stuff like that, thats just normal. Its fine to be critical of them, but that doesn't mean they aren't our best source about how the internal of the switch works, at least unless you start reversing the switch to, and prove mistakes in their conclusions. There are also other people outside of reswitched that reverse parts of the system, but I don't think they really said anthing against the stuff reswitched reported based on reversing the system, even if they don't agree with the reswitched themself, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Also there is a big difference between reswitches theories and what they verified by reversing. The stuff about how the sxos modchip works was openinly communicated as theory, since they didn't have one to look at it and find out how it works.
After it got released they and the community as a whole figured out how it really works.