There's also this. I suggest reading up on Yifan Lu's writeup on emulating the system transfer process and see what an arduous task that was. I'm not dismissing you, OP, but you have quite the road ahead of you.
Last edited by Joom,
Homebrew Reverse engineering Nintendo Network!
- Thread starter ItsKaitlyn03
- Start date
- Views 15,459
- Replies 101
- Likes 13
sorry for the rambling and poor grammar im pretty tired anyways when did i say gmod was the first half life 2 mod?
also nintendo tried to take down a game that had nothing from any of there property's just a similar set up to fire emblem they abuse copyright and its not going to help there dying console division
also valve asked garry to monetize it as far as i know not the other way around anyways i think we should stop this we have derailed this thread for long enough don't you agree?
Is the RTS scheme of Fire Emblem proprietary to Nintendo? They could have that trademarked, but meh, I do agree. We can move on.
D
Deleted User
Guest
its not many other games have used it they were just attacking the company because they were small and inspired by the series honestly i think whats going to kill nintendo is there disregard for every other company and person ever they have been pulling these scumbag tactics since the nes days and now its really starting to bite there asses being that next to no 3rd party devs will work with them
Check the patent office of your country, or wherever it may be held. Companies have trademarked weirder things (see Apple v. Samsung over the rounded square icon design).
except this is a videogame type and therefore is much harder if not impossible to trade mark it would be like trying to trademark a film genera
If the genre were a complete niche then yeah, somebody technically could patent it. Apple tried to patent the word "cloud" (they may have by now), and there are much dumber ones everywhere. Nintendo wouldn't be able to patent the RTS genre itself, but if their particular design derived from it was entirely proprietary, then sure.
even for a niche it would be a real struggle and most governments would refuse it as an attempt to monopolize something
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 6,032
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 24
- Location
- 日本
- Website
- www.facebook.com
- XP
- 3,217
- Country
Jesus Christ... I love how this community motivates people trying to share anything, to run away.
- Joined
- May 17, 2014
- Messages
- 535
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 31
- Location
- Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia
- XP
- 499
- Country
Excellent! Now that's progress with reverse engineering Nintendo Network. We know the Nintendo Network for Wii U and Nintendo 3DS servers are not going to last forever. I'm not even sure who actually hosts the Nintendo Network gaming servers. But every step of the way in research, development and reconstruction of the network will help with building a custom online network with an accounting system as well. ^^
And in the future, I'd love to see some reverse engineering on DeNA's servers as well for Nintendo Switch. And when that happens, we'll be seeing many people dodging the mandatory subscription fees for online multiplayer. Muahahahahaha! xD
And in the future, I'd love to see some reverse engineering on DeNA's servers as well for Nintendo Switch. And when that happens, we'll be seeing many people dodging the mandatory subscription fees for online multiplayer. Muahahahahaha! xD
But that's just theft, no other way to look at it, running a server isn't free y'know? If they are going to spend money on good servers for better multiplayer the least we can do is pay them back for listening
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
I think they mean just replicating the server themselves, so Nintendo isn't getting any extra server load someone else is, I'm actually half expecting to find out that everything is still p2p and the premium cost is just to cover that 1 month snes/nes game rental
No look at what I quoted, the person said they wanted to dodge nintendos subscription price by reverse engineering the servers. I think they learned their lesson with freeshop and the 3ds and won't let just anything connect and download any file the client wants and actually have a sofisticated system like every other CDN has. If they haven't we should start seeing titles under 0006000 in NUSI think they mean just replicating the server themselves, so Nintendo isn't getting any extra server load someone else is, I'm actually half expecting to find out that everything is still p2p and the premium cost is just to cover that 1 month snes/nes game rental
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
Last edited by KevinX8,
yeah to reverse engineer and dodge the fees could also mean he wants public version for free......but either way I doubt any of those things will be happening at least for a very very long time,
although the whole freeshop stuff was just stupid on Nintendo's side
Lol yeah free public servers sure, the people making the servers would still have to pay the same amount as nintendo is so I doubt they could provide for free unless it was a billionaire hosting it. I've seen claims from people managing to download files from switch titles on NUS so maybe they haven't learnt anything and are still using the same servers for their CDN
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
Last edited by KevinX8,
its nintendo the wii u can't even read dvds you really expect them to do anything intelligent?
honestly wouldn't surprise me.....although as long as the system remains unhacked the fact people can downloads encrypted files is kinda pointless.
I guess there is still time for a rework of the system if things ever start to look like they are going the way of the wiiu and 3ds and add a crude authentication step
but yeah...Nintendo....
Similar threads
-
- Question
- No one is chatting at the moment.
