By now you stopped reading what I'm writing or you refuse to. Focus, because that's probably my last reply to you.Yes, and what you said is full of contradictions.
Is there an exception for ra.pe victims to obtain abortion? Yes or No?
Is there a period in which ra.pe victims can have abortion, where others can't? Yes or no?
Is the "cut-off" time for a ra.pe victim to get an abortion *before* "it becomes a human life"? Yes or no?
*Before* "it becomes a human life", can other women get an abortion? Yes or no?
Can women get abortions during the FIRST-trimester? Yes or no?
Can ra.pe victims get abortions in the FIRST-trimester? Yes or no?
Can women get abortions during the SECOND-trimester? Yes or no?
Can ra.pe victims get abortions in the SECOND-trimester? Yes or no?
About the connection between involuntary organ donation and involuntary pregnancy, I think all those analogies might be distracting you, or something. Just forget about pregnancy, the unborn child, conjoined twins, and all the rest. Just focus on involuntary organ donation alone. Can you tell us why involuntary organ donation is not okay? Again,focus. Why isn't it okay?
Organ donation has nothing to do with pregnancy - lending or leasing would be a better word since the womb never leaves the woman's body - your analogy is incorrect, false, null and void.
I'm only allowing [censored] victims to have an abortion before organs are developed because it practically guarantees that the developing child does not suffer in the process. If the nervous system is not developed yet and a brain is not in place, it is not a conscious life - it only has the potential to become one and I still leave the decision to the woman as she's the one who was assaulted - yes, it's an exception simply because she never asked to be pregnant and although I don't condone abortion, I give her the right to choose because the pregnancy was not a direct result of her negligence or bad choices - I said it numerous times that a Morning-After is a far better solution, but there are situations when it's too late, for example when the victim was imprisoned.
The "cut-off" time is not specified - doctors should examine the fetus and decide whether it will suffer or not. It's not a cut-off time between being human and not being human - there's no such thing. The moment the fertilized egg nests and starts recombining D.N.A into a new strain, it becomes a new human strain. It is not a conscious life though - consciousness is gained via creating a centralized nervous system with a brain as its center.
My opinion is based on human biology and the natural, logical chain of Action and Consequence - your opinion is based on an idea you think is "freedom over all else" and I call "convenience".
Your entire argument runs down to the woman being in full right to protect her bodily integrity - fiar play, she has, however at the same time she has no right to be involved in the integrity of the unborn child's bodily integrity and once you realize that the child is a separate entity from herself, it's all pretty clear. It has separate organs, a separate nervous system and a separate mind - it's a different person that is unfortunately temporarily occupying the space in her womb. The woman's bodily integrity is not infringed upon - every organ is there, she hasn't donated anything whatsoever. You simply choose to believe that she has because that's the easy way out. It's simply more convenient to get rid of the unwanted child - you give the woman the right to dispose of it, yet you wouldn't give her the same right when the child is already born - why so?
I say that it should be up to the doctor to decide whether the child is developed enough to have a conscience of its own and I refuse to give the right for abortion to women who became pregnant out of their own negligence. Women who did not have a say in the matter - [censored] victims, are a different case. It is not their own negligence that caused the pregnancy but an outside, hostile force which took away their right to be safe during intercourse, but even in this case, I respect the conscious life, if it is already developed.
I hope that this is clear enough for you.