Preamble: I am trying to consider the risks of installing cias with pasta on sysnand.
So When i install a cia I know that most (if not all) of the data is stored on the sd card. What I am trying to figure pout is when I use bluemanager or fbi to install cia, what is actually being applied to nand and what is going to sd card.
for instance if I take legit cia's and install them with blue or fbi under pasta (which would remove the sig checks) what is actually being written to the nand vs sd card.
Also what are the risks between legit vs homebrew'd cias? If the sd card is formated would that undo any damage from installing a potentially dangerous cia?
So When i install a cia I know that most (if not all) of the data is stored on the sd card. What I am trying to figure pout is when I use bluemanager or fbi to install cia, what is actually being applied to nand and what is going to sd card.
for instance if I take legit cia's and install them with blue or fbi under pasta (which would remove the sig checks) what is actually being written to the nand vs sd card.
Also what are the risks between legit vs homebrew'd cias? If the sd card is formated would that undo any damage from installing a potentially dangerous cia?