Post minimum to make a topic

Discussion in 'Site Discussions & Suggestions' started by Kwartel, Mar 19, 2010.

?

Do we need a post minimum?

  1. No

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Kwartel
    OP

    Kwartel The fairest in all the land

    Member
    1,298
    35
    Apr 11, 2009
    Netherlands
    What if there is a minimum for making a topic, like 50 posts so we don't get clueless posts anymore.
     


  2. prowler

    prowler Sony

    Member
    9,473
    2,816
    Jul 14, 2009
    Ragol
    No.
    Do you want spam?
     
  3. Hadrian

    Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Former Staff
    16,979
    3,098
    Oct 12, 2004
    Already suggested and shot down many many many times.
     
  4. Kwartel
    OP

    Kwartel The fairest in all the land

    Member
    1,298
    35
    Apr 11, 2009
    Netherlands
    Sorry Hadriano...
    But you get the point right... RIGHT?
     
  5. Hadrian

    Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Former Staff
    16,979
    3,098
    Oct 12, 2004
    I get the point but we'll get more people trying to bump their post count up and also what about people who have some hot ass homebrew to share but can't because they can't create a topic?

    Sure they could get a mod to post it but most wont want to wait and just decide this forum is too elitist for them.
     
  6. Overlord Nadrian

    Overlord Nadrian Banned

    Banned
    6,671
    10
    Jul 28, 2008
    Belgium
    Riviera
    People will spam. So no.
     
  7. ProtoKun7

    ProtoKun7 GBAtemp Time Lord Regenerations: 3

    Global Moderator
    7,514
    1,555
    Jan 3, 2009
    Gallifrey
    Rather than a post limit, maybe staff approval first. Of course, if that was going to happen, then we wouldn't be able to make fun of them D:
     
  8. Kwartel
    OP

    Kwartel The fairest in all the land

    Member
    1,298
    35
    Apr 11, 2009
    Netherlands
    Oh right, thanks for changing my mind!!!
     
  9. Hadrian

    Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Former Staff
    16,979
    3,098
    Oct 12, 2004
    Suggested before and deemed too much work for the staff.
     
  10. ProtoKun7

    ProtoKun7 GBAtemp Time Lord Regenerations: 3

    Global Moderator
    7,514
    1,555
    Jan 3, 2009
    Gallifrey
    I like the system as it is, but this suggestion would be the better alternative out of two not overly great suggestions.
     
  11. p1ngpong

    p1ngpong Unamused frog

    Former Staff
    6,435
    10,320
    Apr 18, 2008
    Croatia
    DS Scene
    That limit would simply have the opposite effect of what you intend. It would increase the number of useless posts massively. [​IMG]

    Probably the only workable solution to what you want to achieve with your suggestion is to have a time limit from the time someone joins before they can make any threads. Say they have to wait two weeks before thy can make any threads. That way spamming will achieve nothing, they learn patience and to search, and the staff aren't bogged down with the need to approve every new thread in the forum.
     
  12. EyeZ

    EyeZ GBAtemp Addict

    Member
    2,487
    517
    Dec 4, 2009
    Or hi-jack someone else's thread.
     
  13. p1ngpong

    p1ngpong Unamused frog

    Former Staff
    6,435
    10,320
    Apr 18, 2008
    Croatia
    DS Scene
    Indeed, that's the problem with any thread making restriction. People would more then likely just post off topic questions and stuff like that in other threads.
     
  14. Issac

    Issac I

    Global Moderator
    GBAtemp Patron
    Issac is a Patron of GBAtemp and is helping us stay independent!

    Our Patreon
    5,217
    2,310
    Apr 10, 2004
    Sweden
    Sweden
    What if we combine the two systems: less than 10 posts, and the topic will have to be approved by staff first?
     
  15. ProtoKun7

    ProtoKun7 GBAtemp Time Lord Regenerations: 3

    Global Moderator
    7,514
    1,555
    Jan 3, 2009
    Gallifrey
    Probably still too intensive for the staff.
     
  16. Llama Riot

    Llama Riot Banned

    Banned
    258
    1
    Feb 18, 2010
    United States
    Hell!
    People who either a)joined the day of posting the topic; b) have less than 10/5? posts should have their topics previewed by mods so that all the dumb crap doesn't have to be carried out in public and clutter up the forum.

    NOTE TO SELF: Read thread before posting.
     
  17. how_do_i_do_that

    how_do_i_do_that Blue Wizard is about to die.

    Member
    4,919
    256
    May 16, 2008
    Antarctica
    You have insufficient posts to view location.
    Would having a popup message about whatever game with AP message to goto a specific thread(s), for those with 50 or less post counts when they click on the new topic button. Have this as a kind of alert system that you can turn off and on when a working patch comes out, a mod can turn off that popup message system. If not a popup, be right above the fields, like the trading section with the rules and such.
     
  18. Hadrian

    Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Former Staff
    16,979
    3,098
    Oct 12, 2004
    Well I did suggest something akin to what happens on Digg when you submit an article.

    On Digg when you submit something, it does a little search around in case the article has already posted before you can actually submit it. Something like this could help with lots of newby threads.
     
  19. how_do_i_do_that

    how_do_i_do_that Blue Wizard is about to die.

    Member
    4,919
    256
    May 16, 2008
    Antarctica
    You have insufficient posts to view location.
    It would be good to redirect most of the traffic if possible, might be a resource hog though considering how fast they spawn.
     
  20. DarknessxD407

    DarknessxD407 Advanced Member

    Newcomer
    65
    0
    Sep 23, 2009
    United States
    this might be too much but what if we had administrators approve posts and depending on the accuracy to the subject would get approval ratings the ones most related to the topic would stand out and the spam would not be seen. You could post but your post would not show until it reaches a approval level. this might be too much for the staff so the staff could have members in which they trust regulate the posts (do some of their job) this idea might be better to prevent spam and have a minimum post to make a topic.

    in short for this to work it would require a complete remake of the posting.