If you're going to believe that without evidence, then it's clear what your standards for belief are, and it explains your posts.LOL, he probably did and just does not want to admit it.
LOL, he probably did and just does not want to admit it.
I know. It's just my guess.To be clear I never implied that.
So you're making outrageous and unsubstantiated claims about a user, and you're specifically targeting said user with, for example, location statuses such as "Calling out Lacius for being high on HRC's lies" instead of addressing actual posts and content. I do not believe I am the troll here.I know. It's just my guess.
I'm not exactly interested.@Lacius
Here is who you will want to PM for more information:
https://gbatemp.net/members/crazyska.237/
LOL, and yet you call me out for making guesses...I'm not exactly interested.
Did I make some sort of unsubstantiated claim?LOL, and yet you call me out for making guesses...
I'm saying that you called me out for not knowing that for certain, you said that you did not know if someone else's guess was right, and you said that you did not want to know.Did I make some sort of unsubstantiated claim?
I don't see any reason to care either way. Regardless, we're derailing the thread. Enough.I'm saying that you called me out for not knowing that for certain, you said that you did not know if someone else's guess was right, and you said that you did not want to know.
If you never want to find out, then all we can do is guess as to why it was removed and the extent to how it was dealt with.
Here's a reminder of what we were talking about:
That's a different story entirely then. However, I don't personally believe her positions disqualify her for the presidency (I'm not going to agree with someone 100% of the time), and I'm actually in alignment with her on several of those positions. The ones I disagree with are also ones I can live with relative to everything else.To get us back on topic and because I missed this, I was not stating Hilloary should be disqualified for her Statements. Now constitionally Trump, Clinton, Stein all of the main 6 are qualified in that regard. However her past actions of support of military interaction, views on encryption, views on whistleblowing, views on the death penalty, and so forth give me reason to believe that she is not qualified for presidency in terms of her policy ideas.
And sorry I did not say that clearerThat's a different story entirely then
Same with every candidate as I feel each informed voter will have certain views which they will judge of someone is qualified to receive their vote. But you are right it really is personal.However, I don't personally believe her positions disqualify her for the presidency (I'm not going to agree with someone 100% of the time)
Tbh, whoever wins, America is gonna be pretty fucked.