Maybe it will be mobile.This shouldn't come off as a surprise to anyone. Either the next Pokemon game will be the Switch or another pure handheld console.
Gotta catch em GO $.
Maybe it will be mobile.This shouldn't come off as a surprise to anyone. Either the next Pokemon game will be the Switch or another pure handheld console.
No. If I paid $300 for a Switch I will not be paying $500 for a Switch-3DS crossoverThis will be the slow transition from 3DS to Switch. It served its purpose, reached its lifespan, now time to move on or at least save money for the Switch. I still wonder if we will see a dual screen lineup or we will be getting a Switch 2nd gen. This thought excites me.
Well it's about time they move on from the 3DS tbh. The original came out 6 years ago.
This will be the slow transition from 3DS to Switch. It served its purpose, reached its lifespan, now time to move on or at least save money for the Switch. I still wonder if we will see a dual screen lineup or we will be getting a Switch 2nd gen. This thought excites me.
The console its self may been but do remember the first main core 3DS title in 2013 being XY
You talking about the Switch or something else....?They'll be moving to the next handheld soon, and that's likely where the next pokemon will be.
You talking about the Switch or something else....?
IMHO it would be stupid for Nintendo to release a new dedicated handheld now.
I just can't see another 3DS-style handheld doing as well as the 3DS. Unless that new handheld was backwards compatible with the existing 3DS library, a new handheld would be stinted right out of the gate. Sure, people said the same thing about the 3DS when it first launched, but back then, Nintendo's home console business was in deep waters and so they threw more of their weight behind the 3DS. It was easy, since the distinction between their home and handheld lines was clear. With the Switch, they're heavily advertising the console's portability. A new handheld would have a hard time gaining traction, I feel, when combined with Switch marketing + smartphone market share + possible lack of games library. Maybe an even stronger 3DS might do, but shy of a mini Switch, a brand new handheld would have a very hard time getting off the ground. Keep in mind, Nintendo's already banking heavily on mobile games. I see the Switch as their only dedicated games machine while they hold the pure mobile market through mobile titles.Actually it'd be stupid if they didn't.
The Switch isn't a handheld. It's PORTABLE, but that doesn't make it a handheld. It doesn't serve that function, and while phones have taken a chunk out of the handheld market, Nintendo still firmly holds a grasp over it.
I can't put my switch in my pocket and go out, or go to school with it to play on breaks. Or on a bus, etc. You can carry it around in a little case (I have one) but it's still a bit clunky. Like I said, portable not handheld. It doesn't serve the same purpose.
If Nintendo is incompetent (and quite honestly given how they are these days...) they WOULD think the Switch can replace the 3DS. However if they're intelligent, then they've got a new more powerful handheld lined up to begin selling soon.
Well.... as long as the thing is as portable as it seems it can be..Switch will kill off the 3ds.