Waiting for MH Online for the west too?
No because there are minor differences due to the engine not being ported properly and it triggers me. I'll just get the NX versions or whatever, they'll surely have an ultra ultimate generation 4 title with all the content plus bonuses so I'm not gonna miss on anything.
Lol pretty standard spec wars style comment. You know, part of the reason 3DS gets not just excellent first-party support but decent third-party as well is because it's not overly complex to program for. Simple hardware isn't bad hardware.
Most japanese developers already abandoned handhelds for shitty P2W phone games, actually. The 3DS's third party line-up compared to that of the DS is embarrassingly poor because of this. Nintendo handhelds are relatively popular because they never had serious competition due to Sony failing hard first and foremost, everything else comes after. Besides, where were all the games during the first year where the 3DS was doing really bad, why did a ton of them get canceled?
Bad hardware is just bad hardware and a different issue in itself. The WiiU notoriously has the worst devkits of its generation making its early development hell (to the point where analysts blame the entire success of the system on the early devkit incident) and it's also the weakest system. Devkits/architecture and specs are mostly unrelated to each other.
If specs are primary concern for gaming it's time to go PC Master Race. After all, the current PS4 and Xbone hardware was, what, equivalent to a mid-range PC from about 2010? By the line of reasoning used in the original post they're not useful and advanced devices and you're better off buying a machine you have to consistently upgrade to play new games if you want maximum graphical fidelity. Lot of people can't be bothered with that...
Actually...
House himself publicly stated they made Scorpio to hope to stop enthusiastic gamers from moving to PC. The Neo is being made for the same reason. Are you sure the numbers are what you think they are? Are two companies spending millions and changing their core release structure for a dozen nerds that care too much? It's not 2003 anymore, most young people know how to use and maintain computers by now.
You could just compare Steam's numbers with console userbase numbers, while keeping in mind that steam is not a proprietary, mandatory OS but merely one third party store. Or the fact that the number of console exclusives is steadily diminishing. It's harder to get exclusivity deals from developers because the market is much wider now.
Individual onsoles perform the best in the "AA" sub-market of games (which happens to be where I find my favourite games in general), but overall, they are actually a minority market today, compared to phones and PCs.
Finally, the great thing about PC is not power, but flexibility. You have the choice to get power, however much fits your needs. You also have the choice to get a computer that's cheaper than consoles that only plays oudated games or 2D indie games. It's what console manufacturers are trying to chase now, after turning their consoles into baby computers since last gen (what with game installs, firmware updates, stores, overlays, complex OSes, etc). The trend in the intended consoles' evolution is very to me.