Playstation Vita Production Halted

[Foxi4]

So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/

The production of software is not postponed - they only postponed the production of consoles if I understand correctly.

 

[emigre]

So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/

It means I can only have Uncharted and Lumines. On the bright side, it's still better than what the 3DS has got.

 

[mechagouki]

Up next, Atari sue Nintendo for making a home video game console....

 

[xNicollas]

maybe its because of the little balls on the left side

 

[Skelletonike]

Up next, Atari sue Nintendo for making a home video game console....

=S
Atari didn't make the first console, the first was the Odyssey which was created by Ralph Baer, if anything it'd be him sueing Atari and not what you said.

 

[Foxi4]

The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.

Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.

Hint - it's not.

Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.

 

[emigre]

The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.

Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.

Hint - it's not.

Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.

Honestly I think it has something to do with the tyranny within the elites of Apple. Their success has led them to believe they have a right to a market monopoly. It seems to me, Apple are like typical communists.

 

[Snailface]

If this results in the transformation of that ugly* iOS interface, I'll be very happy.
Apple is doing Sony a great service here. I'm not usually the one to condone a lawsuit, but I'll waiver on this one.

I hope they can keep the music though -- I like it. ^.^

* please understand this is only 1 snail's opinion.
I respect others as you respect mine.

** April 1st? : p
My brain is 5 minutes slow as always XD

 

[emigre]

So does it mean, the people who already bought it wont get new games for it?
That sucks :/

It means I can only have Uncharted and Lumines. On the bright side, it's still better than what the 3DS has got.

keep telling yourself that it will make it all better

I'm not, my girlfriend is.

 

[Foxi4]

The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.

Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.

Hint - it's not.

Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.

Honestly I think it has something to do with the tyranny within the elites of Apple. Their success has led them to believe they have a right to a market monopoly. It seems to me, Apple are like typical communists.

Perhaps, but still, trying to convey the idea that "having icons" by proxy means "copying Apple" is unacceptable. This needs to end, I have had enough of Apple putting an end to promising infrastructures and devices. First they limit distribution of Samsung devices on ridiculous grounds, which is direct intervention into free market and should be considered a *mortal sin* and now they're putting logs on the way of a device that isn't even a threat to theirs.

 

[notmeanymore]

when I first saw a Vita being used by a friend of mine I thought he was using his ipad.

If anything, this means Apple representatives are blind and retarded.

 

[p1ngpong]

Scenes outside Apple store New York captured on an ipad megapixel camera.

Spoiler

 

[chartube12]

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! real bastards named Apple!

Apple thinks every touch based interface belongs to them. Are they going to go after Nintendo too?

 

[ZaMaster]

This sounds more like an april fools newsitem .

 

[emigre]

The lawsuit is moronic, neither the device nor the interface looks anything like Apple's - they're simply trying to stall the sales of the Vita. For what reason? I have no clue. They're not even in the same sector of the industry. If they think that this will boost sales of crappy iOS games then they're going to be quite suprised that their ploy didn't work.

Or perhaps Apple is the only company in the world who still thinks that the "3G" version of the Vita is a phone, and thus a potential threat to iPhone's dominance.

Hint - it's not.

Just another moronic suit of Apple's - this'll blow over in a matter of weeks. The only people hurt are the customers. I sincerely hope that the judge will order Apple to pay Sony for the losses they sustained while the Vita was put on-hold.

Honestly I think it has something to do with the tyranny within the elites of Apple. Their success has led them to believe they have a right to a market monopoly. It seems to me, Apple are like typical communists.

Perhaps, but still, trying to convey the idea that "having icons" by proxy means "copying Apple" is unacceptable. This needs to end, I have had enough of Apple putting an end to promising infrastructures and devices. First they limit distribution of Samsung devices on ridiculous grounds, which is direct intervention into free market and should be considered a *mortal sin* and now they're putting logs on the way of a device that isn't even a threat to theirs.

I'm afraid this could lead to a mass consumer revolt. Where Apple put a lawsuit on everything, that the average consumer can't buy anything other than Apple approved products. I fear the strain of this could lead to mass social and civil disobedience.

 

[Sir-Fritz]

Cnet buyout was better.

 

[EnigmaBlade]

*mega facepalm* why must you embarrass yourself like this apple?

 

[Foxi4]

This sounds more like an april fools newsitem .

Might be. I just realized that it is April 1st, at least here and for about 40 minutes now.

Googled and didn't find any results, so I'll assume it's just a well-played joke. It's too retarded to be true .

 

[Puregamer]

ahahah april fools, can't believe so many people are falling for it

 

[emigre]

Foxi, you were being serious? I was talking out of my arse.