Hacking Nintendo Switch Update 2.2.0 Out

  • Thread starter Thread starter Polarise
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 29,808
  • Replies Replies 157
  • Likes Likes 2
Status
Not open for further replies.
OK say I'm wrong? we will see if this exploit is surfaced before the Switch has any sort of chance and then lets all see how it takes a massive plummet in every corner of its life span! but then probably the likes of you will come and blame it on something completely random...
So you think that shovelware comes because of piracy, and not because of companies trying to take advantage of a consoles sales success, in order to make more money from their franchise, by turning it into a video game and sell it on the most popular console? Good lawd.
 
So you think that shovelware comes because of piracy, and not because of companies trying to take advantage of a consoles sales success, in order to make more money from their franchise, by turning it into a video game and sell it on the most popular console? Good lawd.

There's no point in even trying. He doesn't understand how any of it works.
 
There's no point in even trying. He doesn't understand how any of it works.
ergh... sorry to differ with you but I think its you who will find, that doesn't know how it all works... and please don't argue with someone that has 40 years history of business and is a director of 3 companies. Your really pissing up the wrong tree here and your not a dog are you? or maybe you are the way you comment because it sounds like your taking orders from everyone else.
 
Last edited by Reecey,
Hacking the console won't kill it by any means.
Heck I'm just waiting for a proper browser and/or userland exploit to appear to get one.

I don't care about backup loading, I care about browsing on it and emulation mostly, and seeing how there's not even Virtual Console for it yet, I might as well go for it. Also, fuck the Virtual Console and its stupid copyright limitations. I go for emulation to play my entire Nintendo library without having to worry if the fucking game is available on eShop or not just because another company holds the rights to it (Rare titles being the best example).

That's pretty much it, besides I don't care about any title for it yet until Odyssey comes out, so no rush there.

Oh and the Wii didn't have 3rd party support because of hardware limitations, not because of it being hacked.
 
ergh... sorry to differ with you but I think its you who will find, that doesn't know how it all works... and please don't argue with someone that has 40 years history of business and is a director of 3 companies. Your really pissing up the wrong tree here and your not a dog are you? or maybe you are the way you comment because it sounds like your taking orders from everyone else.
>claims to be the "director of 3 companies"
>uses "your" instead of "you're"

Also I like how you whine about console hacks yet you proudly display all of your hacked consoles in your signature. Hypocrisy much?
 
>claims to be the "director of 3 companies"
>uses "your" instead of "you're"

Also I like how you whine about console hacks yet you proudly display all of your hacked consoles in your signature. Hypocrisy much?
Don't you get started please! your not his owner by any chance? and I could back that up with Risk Disc right now if you want to challenge that?

Edit: by the way you sound a tit you do know what "Your & You're" mean, here you go they are basically the same definition:
https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=google+uk+search#q=Your

My signature is there to display my devices like I mentioned I never buy a console/handheld on the chances of it being hacked this early! if you think that you are being mislead.
 
Last edited by Reecey,
This almost certainly patches the exploits submitted to Nintendo via their bug bounty program.

I see no real need to update for a "stability" patch at this point, it's not like the update adds any new features.

Once I finish Zelda I'm likely not to touch my switch until the first DLC comes out. Let's see how our devs progress between now and the DLC release, I'll decide then whether it's worth updating for.


Yeah, the "emulation isn't piracy" discussion got a lot harder to justify since Nintendo introduced the Virtual Console. It immediately negated the major "BUT Nintendo don't sell or make money off of these games anymore!" argument that most people use.


Code:
like this
[tweet]tweet URL goes here[/tweet]

Except, emulators themselves aren't piracy and are considered original works under US copyright law, thanks to supreme court judges back in the early 2000's. You can't copyright hardware, so the software itself is never illegal, the BIOS, ROMs, ISO images, etc are a different matter. I don't know where people are getting the whole "emulation software/programs are illegal" crap. Haven't they looked up Sony v. Connectix Game Station, Sony v. Bleem and Nintendo v. Galloob Toy Inc? In all cases, judges have deemed emulators as fair game, as they are a derivative and original work, all reverse engineered.

Nintendo still uses ROM dumps readily available on the internet for their VC service, as one can find out via a hex editor lol.
 
Last edited by the_randomizer,
Don't you get started please! your not his owner by any chance? and I could back that up with Risk Disc right now if you want to challenge that?

Considering you have shown us that your claims are easily refuted by a considerable amount of people, you are not impressing anyone here.
EDIT: You are severely overestimating the number of people that do hack their consoles lover the people that do not.
 
Last edited by gamefan5,
Considering you have shown us that your claims are easily refuted by a considerable amount of people, you are not impressing anyone here.
That wasn't my intention but you do all keep replying? be careful using the word "refuted" that's a big word by the way, you might hurt yourself.
 
Last edited by Reecey,
Edit: by the way you sound a tit you do know what "Your & You're" mean, here you go they are basically the same definition:
https://www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=google+uk+search#q=Your
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Are you dense?
 
44a399b0833a673263e357dc3689faec_toy-story-meme-drama-memes-drama_556-295.jpeg
 
That wasn't my intention but you do all keep replying? be careful using the word "refuted" that's a big word by the way, you might hurt yourself.
I will be fine, thanks.
Then I will use the word "challenged".


https://gbatemp.net/threads/piracy-common-myths.344858/


  • Piracy kills game systems.
    There is no correlation between systems that fail (or succeed) and piracy. Multiple systems have failed terribly without any piracy in their lifetime (Virtual Boy, N-Gage, CD-i), while other systems that had piracy enabled for the majority of their lifetime ended up being some of the top sellers of their generation (PS1, Wii, GBA, DS, etc.)

    This holds true for games as well, for example the PS3 was the last console of the 7th generation to be hacked (and patched the hacks quickly and recent models are unhackable), yet it sold many less games than the Wii, which was the first to be hacked (and does not patch hacks quickly, and still has hackable models being sold).

Saying that it kills the console is an old argument that does not hold true.

EDIT: And FYI, your and you're is not the same.
 
Last edited by gamefan5,
heh. Literally the only "homebrew" I ever see is emulators so you can illagally play other games, and apps for managing all your illegally played games (FTP browsers, "trainers", etc) plus the occasional half-assed media player that breaks and is outperfomed by a Roku.
What about rom hacks? For example, I own every main series 3ds Pokemon game there is right now. I got super bored after beating oras, so I wanted to add some originality to it. Not to mention that 9 cases out of 10 you need to have the game to play a rom hack of it. As for emulators, some people actually own games, but just want to be able to play them all on one system. There many more ways that homebrew is harmless than there are ways that it is bad, and the hackers that develope homebrew (smealum, kaphotics, etc.) don't have piracy in mind when they make stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShadowOne333
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Are you dense?
yes yes I get you! I was writing in urban terms I meant as in you're but I was shorting in down to "your" maybe if your from the UK, Birmingham you might of understood me better, OK ;)

Edit: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=your
 
Last edited by Reecey,
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum