Laptop GTX use as much power while AMD made some huge improvement from RX 460 and RX 480.But Pro 460 is in notebooks right? No point comparing laptop GPU's with desktop mostly when Nvidia have nothing currently similar to it.
Laptop GTX use as much power while AMD made some huge improvement from RX 460 and RX 480.But Pro 460 is in notebooks right? No point comparing laptop GPU's with desktop mostly when Nvidia have nothing currently similar to it.

Nvidia is also using desktop cards in their laptops this generationLaptop GTX use as much power while AMD made some huge improvement from RX 460 and RX 480.
I know. But instead of doing that, AMD made some huge improvements to their MXM cards.Nvidia is also using desktop cards in their laptops this generation


Also, I should point out The AMD chips are 14nm finFET while the GTX chips are 16nm finFET which is pretty surprising seeing as how the gaps between the chips arent that large even though the amd chips have the advantage.Laptop GTX use as much power while AMD made some huge improvement from RX 460 and RX 480.
Indeed, AMD are definitely the better choice for those on a budget.In terms of raw horsepower Nvidia is killing it, but AMD is holding on solidly to their spot as budget/mid-range king.


What's the link for the Eurogamer article? I'm curious as to what THEIR sources areSeems a maxwell chip is pretty much confirmed, thanks to Eurogamer confirming VentureBeat. We have bo clue if its 16nm or 20nm though. Pretty depressing that its considerably less powerful than XONE. Im guessing theyll release a mid gen refresh or an SCD to counteract this in the future. Also you guys think this'll utilise the grid?

Actually the dev of Elder scrolls said they are really confused about Switch's spec and won't develop for a console that cannot handle the basic stuff.Well, I'll wait. Too many contradictions. Besides, no devs have been complaining.

Actually the dev of Elder scrolls said they are really confused about Switch's spec and won't develop for a console that cannot handle the basic stuff.

Actually the dev of Elder scrolls said they are really confused about Switch's spec and won't develop for a console that cannot handle the basic stuff.
Can I get a source for all this?

Can I get a source for all of this?Actually the dev of Elder scrolls said they are really confused about Switch's spec and won't develop for a console that cannot handle the basic stuff.

It's about 'Prey', and I think I might have mixed up about some other posts regarding that Venture Beat rumour. (I guess in the end I am just a troll)
https://www.finder.com.au/prey-on-nintendo-switch

With 3 generations of advancement, and how Nvidia still 'worth more' in terms of Teraflops, the switch will perform better than the original xbox one even at a lower Teraflop. That said, rx 480 is faster than gtx 980 despite similar teraflop rating.Even if it's Maxwell it'll have at least 75% of XBO's power, and more importantly, both Maxwell and Pascal support all major modern gaming engines.
1) Tegra x1 needs overclocking to remotely match the switch according to the older dev kit. This combined with Eurogamer's statement about 307.2MHz suggest at least 1024 cuda cores. This gives 629G fp32.What why
//Sent from my glorious OnePlus X


