Jewel encrusted baby skull

[steveo1978]

You might as well ban art as a whole with such a mind set. "You should't do it if it "hurts" people"

Art and most modern art is about provoking, making people think, make them question their beliefs. This piece does just that.

"What is life worth? Is life but worth money? Or is life actually worth a lot of money?" for example are question that you could ask yourself by looking at this.

How does any of those questions apply to this? You know its a skull from a DEAD baby right? So how does that say life is worth money? What I get from this is this ass hole is trying to make money off the death of a baby. Its another level of sickness when stuff deals with stuff that has a negative effect involving kids. You look at a person that kills or rapes an adult, then look at a person that rapes or kills a child. This guy can be compared to a rapist or a murderer because he is trying to gain something from the suffering of another person. To me it looks like he is glorifying the death of a child. I mean what could have been going through this guess mind while he was doing it? Was it only thoughts of how much money he was gonna make off trying to sell this baby skull? To me art should make a statement and this does not make any statement that a sane person would get.

so are doctors rapist and murderers for making money off of dying people? how about reporters? are they terrorist for making money on reporting about 9/11?

To every rule there is an exception. Where I am from people go to doctors to end suffering. So Doctors are actually making money off people getting better so that does not even relate to what I said. And actually a Reporter could be considered a terrorist since they are using the terror caused by one act to get their views across.

 

[_Chaz_]

You might as well ban art as a whole with such a mind set. "You should't do it if it "hurts" people"

Art and most modern art is about provoking, making people think, make them question their beliefs. This piece does just that.

"What is life worth? Is life but worth money? Or is life actually worth a lot of money?" for example are question that you could ask yourself by looking at this.

How does any of those questions apply to this? You know its a skull from a DEAD baby right? So how does that say life is worth money? What I get from this is this ass hole is trying to make money off the death of a baby. Its another level of sickness when stuff deals with stuff that has a negative effect involving kids. You look at a person that kills or rapes an adult, then look at a person that rapes or kills a child. This guy can be compared to a rapist or a murderer because he is trying to gain something from the suffering of another person. To me it looks like he is glorifying the death of a child. I mean what could have been going through this guess mind while he was doing it? Was it only thoughts of how much money he was gonna make off trying to sell this baby skull? To me art should make a statement and this does not make any statement that a sane person would get.

so are doctors rapist and murderers for making money off of dying people? how about reporters? are they terrorist for making money on reporting about 9/11?

To every rule there is an exception. Where I am from people go to doctors to end suffering. So Doctors are actually making money off people getting better so that does not even relate to what I said. And actually a Reporter could be considered a terrorist since they are using the terror caused by one act to get their views across.

I wouldn't call it their views, as they read from a teleprompter.

 

[ProtoKun7]

And actually a Reporter could be considered a terrorist since they are using the terror caused by one act to get their views across.

With that statement you probably lost some credibility.

 

[boktor666]

wtf... so this is what art has become. I can't imagine anyone buying this thing. What about the parents of the baby, did they give permission (if so, they should be slapped

)