Uh, Rare/MS doesn't own DK64 or DKC, they were on the Wii U. The other games, yeah.

 

Such a useless thread... why would microsoft release a game they own on the switch? makes no sence, why make it work on the competition when they havent even released it on PC where most of there "exclusives" end up?

 

minecraft was multiplatform before microsoft bought it and we dont even know what deal they have with the maker.

 

Yeah, I don't mind double dipping.

Sent from my SM-T280 using Tapatalk

 

I'd only get it for the N64 Rare titles.
Everything else can suck a dick lol

 

Why would they make it great again when they even didn't do much with rare at the end anymore and most rare games at the end were a bust anyway and hence why they sold it to Microsoft.

 

Viva pinata was good and so was grabbed by the ghoulies, kameo wasn't a bad game. The new killer instinct is quite good plus sea of thieves looks amazing. How is that hot garbage ? The reason Conker was the way it is because games were in a bad spotlight back in that day when Microsoft remade it

 

Yeah wich was the way it was because back in that day video games were in a more bad spotlight then they are now and most games that would be a bit controversial would get banned in most countries. People were over PC back then like they are now at the moment

 

Why are people thinking DKC isn't owned by Nintendo? It is. IDK why people perpetuate that myth that MS owns them.

DKC trilogy is on the Wii U, DK Tropical Freeze is too, so is DK64. Microsoft never has and never will own the IP rights to the Donkey Kong Country series.

http://www.nintendolife.com/news/20...t_they_owned_donkey_kong_after_acquiring_rare