Christ...I have to look up something, and suddenly there's three pages worth of opinion that doesn't address a blatant lie in the OP.
Still...better late than never:
The EU and America recognize Juan Guaidó as the President of Venezuela so...
Excuse me...about the EU...you're either pulling that shit out of your ass, or you've been listening to someone who pulled it from their ass. In either case: that statement is completely false.
In reality, the EU is (as of writing currently) still undecided. A large part of Western Europe has set an ultimatum for renewed elections to settle the dispute. The rest of the bunch (among which Belgium) wants to open negotiations without an ultimatum.
True...there's some remarkable "propaganda" going round saying how nice and decent Guaidó is. But as far as his political differences with Maduro's regime, things are pretty quiet. As for what grounds he claims the presidency...I don't know. What I do know (and probably most of you know) is that they both have strong backings from the population.
That should be the reason why the country should or not change leaders. All other countries (including my own) shouldn't have a say in how they resolve it, provided they do it peacefully.
That said...if it wasn't for that, I would've thumbed you up for your analogy. It's a situation with seemingly similar ingredients:
-an election surrounded by shady practices
-the runner-up candidate having a good reason to contest the winner
-the current leader strongly accused (but not yet proven) corruption
-most of the rest of the world openly disproving said leader
Well...That settles...hmm...Wait a second...
-Maduro won with a decent majority of votes; Guaidó wasn't even in the picture
-Hillary actually won the majority vote and thus has much higher claim on the presidency
-just...what exactly is Maduro accused of? On Trump entire books are filled with alleged crimes
-as stated earlier: the world is pretty divided on who should rule Venezuela. In the USA, every country but Russia and Israel disapproves of Trump and would rather have ANYONE ELSE leading the joint (note also that I already stated that for me personally, this shouldn't be an issue)
So...in a way, the analogy is just TOO GOOD to be usable. In other words: why the f*** are other countries faffing about forming an opinion on Venezuela? Attempting an outside coup - because really: that's what this is - should be done against the USA for all these reasons. Even without taking the economical situation into account (face it: USA's wealthfare has a much larger imprint on the world than Venezuela, as much as the poor residents of the country suffer from the mass inflation).