I think it's time to start limiting "visitors" access

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rayder

Mostly lurking lately....
OP
Former Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
6,607
Trophies
2
Location
USA
XP
647
Country
United States
I don't mean cut visitors off completely, but there needs to be something put in place to limit visitors and make them want to register as opposed to just bleeding all the bandwidth from the registered users enjoyment of the site. I've noticed that at almost ALL times, there are 4X the amount of visitors as there are registered users online and the site's bandwidth is suffering because of this.

My ideas for "bandwidth alleviation" are:

Visitors can only access the content of stickied posts, not the non-stickied post content. When they try to access non-stickied post content, the forum should redirect them to the register page. All they should be able to see is topic titles for non-stickied posts. If they want to see the content of non-stickied posts, they must register. This may also cut down on redundant posts in the long run.

They should not be allowed to download squat from GBAtemp (except maybe flashcart firmware's) without being registered. Attempting to do so would take them to the register page. Why should they be able to tap our download bandwidth without us knowing who they are?

The Official cheat database downloads should DEFINITELY be for registered members only, not for every schlep that wanders in our direction looking for cheats. Maybe only that "CheatUp" or other such programs could have such access without being registered....and that would have to be worked out with the app creator for it to reprogrammed to correctly access the cheat database.

Maybe even just prioritizing members over visitors when things start bogging. Like, if a visitor and a member both clicked on the same thing, the member gets there WAY before a visitor ever will. Don't know if that bandwidth priority ability already exists or not, but it sounds good to me.

Like I said, it's not to punish visitors, but to entice them to actually register and possibly become useful members of the community instead of just tapping the site's bandwidth all the time. At least if they were coerced to register to have access to things like downloads, they may just go somewhere else to continue their "free ride" at someone else's bandwidth expense if they don't want to register for whatever reason.

Just throwing some ideas out there. I realize those changes couldn't be implemented overnight, and lord knows I wouldn't have a clue how to implement such changes, but something like this needs to happen or the bandwidth issues will likely continue.

What do you guys think about these ideas? Good? Bad? Stupid? Brilliant? Mean? Inspiring? Tell me what you think.
 

Minox

Thanks for the fish
Former Staff
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
6,995
Trophies
2
XP
6,155
Country
Japan
While I do not agree with everything you said there I do think that downloading files from GBAtemp should be a member only thing.
 

Sstew

GBAtemp's Grim Reaper.
Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
1,461
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
Florida
Website
Visit site
XP
252
Country
United States
Agreed 100%. It'd be helpful to the members as well as entice the visitors to actually register. You got my vote.
 

Szyslak

Nudibranch Lover
Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,442
Trophies
0
Age
47
Location
NY
Website
Visit site
XP
202
Country
United States
I think that's a pretty good idea Rayder. As you said, there may be some things to work out on the implementation side, but the visitor to member ratio is far too high here, especially when considering site slowdowns.

The drawback, of course, is the one-time signups just to DL something. Creating an account and never coming back. Would there be negative effects on the server / database as a result?


...and of course, it took me 4 tries to post my response due to network timeouts.
 

dobz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2009
Messages
133
Trophies
0
XP
29
Country
do it!!!

everthing is so goddam slow
glare.gif
 

Berthenk

Epitome of Awesomeness
Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
1,308
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
170
Country
Netherlands
Yeah, I think this should be used. Espacially for the cheatdatabase! But for the onetime-registers, mabey delete accounts that don't do something (posting, etc.) for one week after registering.
 

playallday

Group: GBAtemp Ghost
Member
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
3,767
Trophies
1
Location
[@N@[)@
Website
Visit site
XP
494
Country
Canada
I agree totally. GBAtemp is getting way too slow.

Szyslak said:
The drawback, of course, is the one-time signups just to DL something. Creating an account and never coming back. Would there be negative effects on the server / database as a result?
That's what I was thinking about.

Maybe make them wait for a week after they signup before being a member. And if they don't sign in after that one week, their user gets deleted.
 

RT-9

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
105
Trophies
0
Age
35
Location
PEI
Website
www.trancecast.tk
XP
93
Country
Canada
yeah they should limit it, i strongly agree with it

because you will get more members then because they want to download it
but they might get annoyed that they have to register first if they want to download something.

just my opinion....
 

geedub

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
396
Trophies
0
Age
50
Location
Scotland
XP
104
Country
hi Kosaic has personally posted a thread along these lines aswell !

http://gbatemp.net/index.php?showtopic=148589


just my quote from that thread

geedub said:
Kosaic said:
Thanks ... I'm a 20+ year computer engineer, so please trust me when I say, it's not my connection
smile.gif

yeah connection been terrible for me aswell ,

i also think a VIP / PRIVATE section could be introduced or similar , i know this goes against the public forum a bit , but i feel some threads are pointlessly spammed and others are just pointless ! i think someone should be able to make their own thread private , and only allow peeps to post that are allowed / invited ! so thererfore you can still read up on the thread but dont have to read the piles of crap ! imo that can only benefit GBAtemp
yaynds.gif
 

Berthenk

Epitome of Awesomeness
Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
1,308
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
170
Country
Netherlands
Dude, this is lame: there are at least 4 times mroe visitors than users, check this:
UsersOnlineGBATemp21April.jpg
... I think it's better if you guys would add a user registration required for downloading/ thingie...
 

tj_cool

Site dev
Supervisor
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
10,064
Trophies
2
Location
This planet
XP
3,105
Country
Belgium
I've seen on some other board that guests are limited to view only a certain amount of topics. Like: when you have clicked 15 topics, you'll go to the register screen. Stickies didn't seem to count.
Anyway, if this idea succeeds, there should be something that deletes members with 0 posts after a week or so. That will stop people from registering once and never coming back.
 

purplesludge

anyone have any ideas for this space
Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
1,047
Trophies
0
Age
34
Location
wv
Website
Visit site
XP
260
Country
United States
Limitations would be great if they help speed the site up. Downloads should definitely be blocked for nonmembers. Everything except gbatemp magazine should have limited access.
 

Santee

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
812
Trophies
1
XP
266
Country
United States
I agree with you about the download and cheats restriction but as other people have said that would leave alot of empty accounts which I think that if they don't post in a month and have below 30 post there accounts should be deleted.
 

Arm73

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
2,046
Trophies
0
Location
Switzerland
XP
587
Country
Italy
I also agree to make downloads available only for registered users, it makes totally sense.

Also for new users there should be something implemented like in the WTB/WTS section, where users should post a certain number of posts before being able to download anything, not 100 maybe but something like 10, or 15 posts to make sure that hit and runs are avoided.

Also it seems like a good idea to limit the forums access, so that unregistered users can only see topics titles and if they click on it they'd be redirected to the registration page.

Recently because of work I can only check gbatemp on Sundays, and that is the worse day to log on, the servers are so slow that 90% of the time my browser fails to show me a page due to connection timeout, and I have an excellent connection.

So definitely I agree that something should be done about it, because even though the servers have been upgraded several times in the past couple of years, it always comes down to too many people browsing the site.
 

Costello

Headmaster
Administrator
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Messages
14,203
Trophies
4
XP
19,739
As much as we appreciate your suggestions, the slowdowns actually have nothing to do with bandwidth.
There are simply too many visitors, which means too many pages to load, too much data to handle for the database server (MySQL server).
There is nothing we can do about it for now, so we are working on a long term solution, but be patient as it will take some time to prepare.
 

Vulpes Abnocto

Not Dead Yet
Former Staff
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
6,723
Trophies
3
Age
43
XP
4,063
Country
United States
I absolutely agree that most of the downloads section should be relegated to "members only" status.

A few exceptions could be made, such as GBAtemp's user-created skins and themes for certain flashcarts. (ie: Sakuratronic) but for the most part, the downloads that are provided here need to be limited in some way.

There will be ramifications for any limits we set, but something needs to be done.
The 'Temp we know and love is becoming far too 'popular'.



EDIT: And just how in the smeg did I get spontaniously logged out while I was typing this the first time?
 

Joey Ravn

F*** you, Nintendo!
Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
1,337
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
103
Country
Rayder said:
Visitors can only access the content of stickied posts, not the non-stickied post content. When they try to access non-stickied post content, the forum should redirect them to the register page. All they should be able to see is topic titles for non-stickied posts. If they want to see the content of non-stickied posts, they must register. This may also cut down on redundant posts in the long run.

Since you mention this, Rayder, I've always thought that not allowing new members to create topics is a good idea. How many "i just bogt the R$ and i dont no wat to doo" threads by new members we have? Maybe making them post 10 times or so in other threads would help. That way they will be forced to read other topics, maybe even find the answer they are looking for, and will considerably cut down redundant topics.

Other than that, I agree with you. It's not punishing visitors, but we old users should be able to navigate the site freely without needing to worry about connection time outs.
 

kobykaan

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2007
Messages
2,993
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
196
Country
LOL @ time of this post 4 members and 2 GUESTS reading!

I think that ALL GUIDES/STICKIES/DOWNLOADS/FIRMWARE THREADS/RELEASE THREADS should been made member only!

This would increase the user base and stop the ones just hanging around to grab the freebie links that are in useful threads and not the download sections!

Maby over the top but maby also think about making people have at least 10 useful posts before allowing more access to the sections closed off... and not spamming the hell out of the forum for no good reason ...been a lot of pointless nonsense posting lately
frown.gif


MAKE A BIGGER SEARCH BUTTON!!! ..So people can see it and a guide how to use it to avoid the same kinda posts over and over and over again!

edit: lol de ja vu at the same comment by Joey Ravn of the 10 post ruling !!!
 

p1ngpong

Gamer Professional Deluxe
Supervisor
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
6,876
Trophies
3
Location
DS Scene
Website
imgur.com
XP
11,391
Country
Croatia
Although when first reading Rayders suggestion I though it would be a good idea, on further thought I think it may have the opposite effect and increase server load.

Firstly all the guest browsing the site cant view sigs, avatars and other things. If half the guests here register for instance just being able to view those alone would increase the load a great deal. Also if they upload their own sigs avas and whatever thats a further unnecessary strain. Theres also the issue of the flood of noobs posting, further increasing the strain on the board, and making it messy and hard to mod.

Basically what Im getting at is an unregistered guest browsing probably uses much less bandwidth then a registered one, whether he be active or not.

Also in regards to limiting download access to only registered users, sounds like a good idea yes. But if a lurker sees a "downloads only available to members" message Im pretty certain they are going to think "Oh I need to sign up to get the roms". So instead of the downloads section being open to guests, and them seeing whats available, its going to be this hidden thing, and Im certain they would jump to the roms conclusion. Then we would get the flood of "I cant find the roms.... blah blah blah." Posts and threads.

And lastly to be completely honest, I think guests being able to view the forums makes the site look friendlier, and in fact cuts down on the n00b floods by a significant amount, those floods being an annoying issue already here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    good night
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    as to you
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    How do you know if the night will be good when you're asleep
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    because i didn't say i was asleep
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    i said i was sleeping...
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    sleeping with uremum
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Even my mum slept on that uremum
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    yall im torn... ive been hacking away at tales of phantasia GBA (the USA version) and have so many documents of reverse engineering i've done
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    I just found out that the EU version is better in literally every way, better sound quality, better lighting, and there's even a patch someone made to make the text look nicer
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    Do I restart now using what i've learned on the EU version since it's a better overall experience? or do I continue with the US version since that is what ive been using, and if someone decides to play my hack, it would most likely be that version?
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    @TwoSpikedHands, I'll preface this with the fact that I know nothing about the game, but, I think it depends on what your goals are. Are you trying to make a definitive version of the game? You may want to refocus your efforts on the EU version then. Or, are you trying to make a better US version? In which case, the only way to make a better US version is to keep on plugging away at that one ;)
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I'm not familiar with the technicalities of the differences between the two versions, but I'm wondering if at least some of those differences are things that you could port over to the US version in your patch without having to include copyrighted assets from the EU version
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    @Sicklyboy I am wanting to fully change the game and bend it to my will lol. I would like to eventually have the ability to add more characters, enemies, even have a completely different story if i wanted. I already have the ability to change the tilemaps in the US version, so I can basically make my own map and warp to it in game - so I'm pretty far into it!
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    I really would like to make a hack that I would enjoy playing, and maybe other people would too. swapping to the EU version would also mean my US friends could not legally play it
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    I am definitely considering porting over some of the EU features without using the actual ROM itself, tbh that would probably be the best way to go about it... but i'm sad that the voice acting is so.... not good on the US version. May not be a way around that though
  • TwoSpikedHands @ TwoSpikedHands:
    I appreciate the insight!
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    @TwoSpikedHands just switch, all the knowledge you learned still applies and most of the code and assets should be the same anyway
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    and realistically they wouldn't

    be able to play it legally anyway since they need a ROM and they probably don't have the means to dump it themselves
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    why the shit does the shitbox randomly insert newlines in my messages
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It does that when I edit a post.
  • Veho @ Veho:
    It inserts a newline in a random spot.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    never had that i don't think
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: never had that i don't think