I know it's not out yet but seems like some people already have M3 zero, and many have suggested M3 zero instead of Acekard 2i. Can someone post the advantage of M3 over Acekard? Thanks
zero383 said:Acekard using official firmware is not very good.
A better comparison would be Acekard w/ AKAIO vs M3i0
PharaohsVizier said:Heh, but keep in mind that the difference between all of those categories is by nothing more than a hair, and some of those are far from definitive as well. I'd say that design of firmware, you can argue that it goes either way, and same with better firmware, etc.
The main reason I think M3i Zero is better is just because it offers RTS without a crappy slow ass menu. The fact that the menu competes one to one with AKAIO makes it even better.
Sorry to bump this thread, but I am deciding between the M3i Zero and the Acekard 2i hence I am very interested in the differences between Sakura and AKAIO.hyun said:Sakura Vs AKAIO
Rom compatibility : AKAIO
Better Firmware : Sakura
Loading speed: AKAIO
Music/Video : Sakura
Design of the firmware : Sakura
Better firmware providing : AKAIO
The people who likes sakura is mostly because of the firmware.
It's neat and cool.
The people who likes AKAIO is mostly because they can play games really good.
Very good firmware providing Unlike Sakura.
Ehh... Sakura was designed and produced long before Moonshell 2 was, and also Moonshell 2 was based off Sakura. Do moar research..iwakura said:sakura firmware is better, being based off of moonshell 2 with better dpg decoding and multimedia playing in general. it has RTS and is updatable should it need to be.
AKAIO however, has a few nice added features (like updatable cheatbase/loaders through wifi), and I particularly like how instant the response is when I navigate around the folders.
I personally prefer sakura over the acekard easily.