Brian117 said:Wow, pretty nice looking.
People will get second thoughts of the game from seeing this box.
But I mean, it isn't 3D. Yet they make the boxart look like it's 3D.
Meh.
Brian117 said:But I mean, it isn't 3D. Yet they make the boxart look like it's 3D.
QUOTE(Noitora @ Dec 17 2008, 12:06 PM) An "old-school" GTA would have been better.
X D D X said:Look's good and similar to the other GTA games.
Wasn't this supposed to have Wifi though?
QUOTE(Maz7006 @ Dec 17 2008, 12:03 PM) Wonder if it has WIFI ( probably not because its not on the box art but you'll never know)
Noitora said:An "old-school" GTA would have been better. I bet this game is going to be really lame.
BlueStar said:Brian117 said:But I mean, it isn't 3D. Yet they make the boxart look like it's 3D.
QUOTE(Noitora @ Dec 17 2008, 12:06 PM) An "old-school" GTA would have been better.
Having not really followed this game, these two comments seem rather contradictory and confuse the hell out of me. Is this game going to be old school top-down 2D or like the newer 3D GTAs
irpacynot said:It is fully 3D, and though Gordon Hall (the head of Rockstar Leeds) doesn't refer to the view as an isometric view, it's pretty much in line with that sort of perspective. Either way, he claims (in the latest issue of Nintendo Power) that this is the most polished and ultimately best project his studio has ever worked on. That's saying something, in my opinion, considering both PSP GTAs (of which Leeds developed both games). The latest NP interview with Hall really clears up a lot of things, and it's just amazing how much stuff they've crammed into this game. Should be excellent.
Brian117 said:Wow, pretty nice looking.
People will get second thoughts of the game from seeing this box.
But I mean, it isn't 3D. Yet they make the boxart look like it's 3D.
Meh.
iPikachu said:its 3d or 2d??! im confused 0_o