Civilization Revolution DS

Discussion in 'NDS - Console and Game Discussions' started by Hadrian, Jan 29, 2008.

  1. Hadrian
    OP

    Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Former Staff
    16,978
    3,095
    Oct 12, 2004
  2. Neko

    Neko Been a while.

    Member
    799
    0
    Dec 5, 2006
    Gambia, The
    #gbatemp.net
    Are they serios ?

    Thanks and Battleshipts and Missiles ? ...
    At 1830 ?


    This Game is probably unbalanced as hell but let's not say this game bad till it's released.
     
  3. Grimalkin

    Grimalkin Waaaaaaaah!

    Member
    1,173
    2
    Jun 9, 2006
    Canada
    Have you ever played Civilization? You start off pretty much bare stone age and eventually hit the Technological Ages. So if your opponent decides to expand instead of tech, and you decide to tech instead of expand. Then you'll have a technological advantage and the opponent will have an area advantage. It's all about balance, how well you plan ahead, and player-style.

    Btw: I remember having a good game against someone that lasted over a week. Now that was Civilization (II).
     
  4. damnet

    damnet GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    110
    0
    Sep 22, 2006
    Brazil
    [​IMG]



    yeah, I agree it must be unbalanced, I mean, in here the tank has 0 chances against the ninja, no one should mess with ninjas... [​IMG]


    on a more serious note, I just found out about this heh, really neat, the ds needs more deep games like civ for it, the casuals got enough already...

    I don't think I like the artwork for it though... could be different in motion, I hope there are pretty animated fight sequences, and some board effects.
     
  5. Veho

    Veho The man who cried "Ni".

    Former Staff
    8,765
    16,184
    Apr 4, 2006
    Croatia
    Zagreb
    The "big" console version alone fills me with dread. The developers themselves said that the game would be dumbed down and "simplified". Something along the lines of "adjusting for the gamepad as opposed to mouse/keyboard", but I think it's more along the line of "attracting casual gamers 'cuz there's more of them".

    So if the "big" game is already "simplified", and portable console games are smaller, simplified versions as it is, I'm really skeptical of the DS version. [​IMG]

    But on the other hand, it looks so good [​IMG]
     
  6. ACQ

    ACQ Advanced Member

    Newcomer
    61
    0
    Jul 29, 2007
    United States
    Spokane, WA
    My initial impression of this game has prompted me to frantically "Press B..."
     
  7. damnet

    damnet GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    110
    0
    Sep 22, 2006
    Brazil
    Yeah well, I believe some simplification is actually necessary, especially for the DS, and of course the developers are not stupid, why aim for the hardcore audience when the casual is so much more abundant? so yeah it will be probably be very "dumbed down"
    compared to the PC versions at least, but if they are able to keep the core gameplay intact it could work.
     
  8. cutterjohn

    cutterjohn GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    648
    18
    Nov 27, 2007
    United States
    It's looks almost EXACTLY like the older 2D Civilizations, specifically Civ I & II excepting for the cheezy cartoony gfx as evidenced by the screenshot with the tank(bott left). I REALLY dislike that style of art, which can also be found in TF2, but TF2 has a whole host of other problems as well.
     
  9. Hillsy_

    Hillsy_ GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    262
    0
    Dec 4, 2007
    I agree, it does look like Civilization I for the PC. At least the units have hitpoints in this version, a minor flaw which wasn't present in the PC original. There are many dedicated Civilization fans across the world. To many, Sid Meier is a legend, not because he is a great game designer but because he revolutionised the genre, especially for the PC.

    This game will hopefully appeal to young and adult gamers alike. I just hope Sid Meier has had some input into the creation of this game and is not just there for his name on the box.

    Time will tell.. or shall I say 'The test of time' for you old timers out there. [​IMG]
     
  10. woody0

    woody0 GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    158
    0
    Jan 29, 2008
    wednesbury
    well i intend to get civilization for the 360, but i havnt seen it anywhere (is it even out yet?!) but if i cant find it, then this will have to do it for me, as iv never played these games before but they look really good to me
     
  11. cupajoe

    cupajoe Have a cup of joe!

    Member
    1,143
    0
    Aug 25, 2007
    United States
    Minnesota
    It kind of looks like it's taking a few pages out of Advance Wars book.
     
  12. animethunder

    animethunder Advanced Member

    Newcomer
    70
    0
    Dec 19, 2007
    United States
    MapleIsland
    Wow. That is so cool.
    What is Civilization?
     
  13. Porkdish

    Porkdish GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    335
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    awesome, fire emblem through to advanced wars with a little anno thrown in.

    i like the look.
     
  14. Jemmalen

    Jemmalen Newbie

    Newcomer
    9
    0
    Aug 4, 2007
    United States
    nyc
    I'm amazed that so few people here know about Civilization.

    They're amazing games - you literally start off as a colony, you pick a ruler from different areas of the world (Ghandi is my personal favorite to play as), and you grow and you grow.. your civilization races to get major aspects of life like Religion, Slavery, things like that.

    Civilization 4 is amazing, but I am warning you, one game is like 8 hours, and that's before you start tweaking everything and you wind up spending days upon days on one game because the AI is insane.

    You win the game by taking over the other civilizations on the world, or making it to Outer Space. There's tons of ways to win.
     
  15. VVoltz

    VVoltz The Pirate Lord

    Member
    2,727
    109
    Nov 6, 2002
    USA
    [​IMG] O [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] v [​IMG] Oh God Lord Almighty. I think I have an erection, OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG, @##$#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$, LOL [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] :'( [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] ROLC (rolling on the floor convulsing) ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC ROLC 2@@#@#@#@#%%#$% release iiiiiiiiiiiit!!!!!!!!!!!!!, where is the #*$&*#&$*#&$*&#$*&#$*%&*#^&^@&@ release!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! eeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!, I want it come one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    :'(
    [​IMG]

    This is great news, but I want it nOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWW!!11!!!!111oneoneoneoneoneone!!111!!!!twotwotow!!threethree!!!
    GIMME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!














    Ehem.... I mean, Thanks for the info, I look forward to it.
     
  16. cutterjohn

    cutterjohn GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Member
    648
    18
    Nov 27, 2007
    United States
    Well, the PC versions were an empire building type of game.

    You started with a group of settlers and one or two warrior type units. You used the settlers to establish a city, which then could build city buildings, settlers(can also make roads and things), and warrior type units. New settler units could be moved to create more cities, build roads(faster movement, also rail later), improve terrain, etc.

    Each city dependent upon where it was built would provide a certain number of resources, gold, food, etc.

    There was also a research component in which you got X number of research points per turn, pick a technology from a technology tree, and after hitting the number of points for that tech, you got it which could unlock other city buildings, warrior units, improvements, gold production increase, knowledge production increase etc.

    There were also trader units so that you could set up trade between your cities and and other player's cities.

    Additionally, there were also the wonder improvements that you could build that would give various improvements.

    The goal was varied, either conquering the entire world, having the most "points" at the end of X turns, largest empire, etc.

    Not sure what or how it will be implemented for the DS though.

    A not very correct version of warrior type improvements would go:
    warrior -> phalanx -> man at arms -> musketeer -> infantry -> mechanized infantry
    scout -> cavalry -> knight -> dragoon -> tank
    There were more units in there and they did not ALL depend upon prior units, but I really don't recall the exact progression but that should give you an idea.

    I should also mention that units included water units as well ranging from fishing ships, trading vessels, to battleships and aircraft carriers IIRC.

    In later stages of the game there are also aircraft units.

    There should be a wikipedia entry for this game series if you really want more/better descriptions of the game.
     
  17. Turmoil

    Turmoil GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    455
    0
    Oct 26, 2002
    *drools* any civ has to be a good thing IMO. Might have to go break Civ4 out of its box again after reading this thread =]
     
  18. Kaos

    Kaos Good show!

    Member
    558
    0
    Nov 25, 2007
    Melbourne, Australia
    I have Civ2 lying around somewhere. It's hilarious when you have aircraft carriers, cruise missiles and tanks running around in 500 A.D.
     
  19. ZAFDeltaForce

    ZAFDeltaForce Specialist

    Member
    2,786
    208
    Sep 9, 2006
    Senegal
    This looks like a pretty sweet game. Sure, it may not be the same as the rest of the other Civilization titles, but it looks pretty good as it is