SX OS, ReiNX with sig patches and Atmosphere with sig patchesWhich CFW is allowing us to play the backup games ?
SX OS, ReiNX with sig patches and Atmosphere with sig patchesWhich CFW is allowing us to play the backup games ?
SX OS, ReiNX with sig patches and Atmosphere with sig patches
I m interesting in ReiNX with sig patches or Atmosphre with sig patches but I am on 3.0.0 and I dont want to update it unless I have to.
I understand that using the jig is essentially the same as pressing a button. This is the reason, why this is not a modification at all.
That is correct, but the shortening the pins is the intended way to enter RCM. This is no modification. It obviously does not change the behaviour.
After an hour long phone call with Nintendo my ban was the result of a clear log after receiving logs on my previous connection with the eshop so clearly your wrong on it not being risky .ReiNx doesn-t officially have sigpatches. Users got them into it and onto atmosphere as well.
No.
Hekate is a separate project from atmosphere.
I was going to say something but I saw the /s
June 15 wasn't atmosphere release date.
And a lot of thing have been added meanwhile.
No those are crashlog aand are very different. Sending none isn't a ban flag and not even risky.
Which log?After an hour long phone call with Nintendo my ban was the result of a clear log after receiving logs on my previous connection with the eshop so clearly your wrong on it not being risky .
Emunand praisers still believe so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯So, if the Switch won't be making contact with Nintendo's servers in terms of logging, do people really think they're safe?
because there are a lot of people here that are not very smart and / or educatedWhy is everyone even arguing if the jig is a hardmod or not?
Until here it seems that you understood what a hard mod isA hardmod (or in some cases also a modchip can fall into the same category) is when you change a machine's intended behaviour by changing how the circuitry or the electronics of it works in any way compared to how it is given to the consumer on sale.
but this is wrong on so many levelsA jig falls into the category of a hardmod
touching is not moddingbecause you are touching certain pins on the hardware side of the machine
most people are stupidif it required you to open the console, most people wouldn't hesitate to call it a hardmod
Obviously it does not. It is intended to behave exactly like thisThe jig still changes how the circuitry works in an original consumer-focused console
Exactly: nothing in between. Using a jig is not a modification at allso sorry but it's not an in-between or anything like that.
oh that should go in the banning hub https://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo-switch-banning-hub-warning.508710/After an hour long phone call with Nintendo my ban was the result of a clear log after receiving logs on my previous connection with the eshop so clearly your wrong on it not being risky .
Depends on what you block or if it needs a replacement.In this case clog are fine to not to send, because, for Nintendo,it looks like you had no fatal error, which is normal.So, if the Switch won't be making contact with Nintendo's servers in terms of logging, do people really think they're safe?
The Switch is (or rather was) not expected to enter RCM from a consumer-side.Obviously it does not. It is intended to behave exactly like this
Exactly: nothing in between. Using a jig is not a modification at all
So you are saying that it is a mod because it is used by others than the intended users? That would make it a 'user mod' if only the user is 'modified'. lol. What you say does not make any senseIt's not intended by N though for use by end users.
So what you want to say is, that the exact same thing would not be a mod if the jig was from Nintendo? Would you consider a third party controller a modification?You're right in that the pins are exposed, but without additional equipment (a custom jig) there is no way any official accessory would short those pins.
They said their exact words were within a week after I linked my account I went from having errors to having none my response was how can you check errors without me sending them they said it sends them before signin along with system version .Which log?
And i said that sending none isn't a ban flag. I didn't say youcan't be banned for them. Ofc you can and will be banned if those are custom error.
So you are saying that it is a mod because it is used by others than the intended users? That would make it a 'user mod' if only the user is 'modified'. lol. What you say does not make any sense
So what you want to say is, that the exact same thing would not be a mod if the jig was from Nintendo? Would you consider a third party controller a modification?
Ill add it to my post on there .oh that should go in the banning hub https://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo-switch-banning-hub-warning.508710/
either way @Draxzelex this might be useful info to finally put that argument to rest if it's legit
Maybe the user is not expected to enter RCM, but the user is able to do it without modifiying the consoleThe Switch is (or rather was) not expected to enter RCM from a consumer-side.
No, THIS is not the fuck up. This is the intended behaviour. Its not for debugging but for repairing purposes.The fact that you have to simply connect two pins to enter it, being it for debugging purposes or whatever, was an undesired fuck up from Nvidia's side.
You cannot call something a modification, if nothing is modifiedis still a modification to how the hardware was given to you from stock.
Debugging leads to repairing.No, THIS is not the fuck up. This is the intended behaviour. Its not for debugging but for repairing purposes.