Another possible PS3 price drop?

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by Gus122000, Jan 20, 2008.

Jan 20, 2008
  1. Gus122000
    OP

    Member Gus122000 GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    594
    Country:
    Antarctica
    Apparently now the ps3 cost a hell of a lot cheaper to manufacture:
    "PlayStation 3 production costs drop substantially"
    "When the Sony PlayStation 3 launched in November 2006, many criticized its expensive price and its inclusion of an internal Blu-ray drive.

    It was not only consumers that felt the squeeze however. The industry group iSuppli estimated last year that the initial cost to manufacture the 60GB unit was $840.35 USD, way higher than even Sony was charging for the console meaning the company was losing hundreds of dollars per console.

    A year later however, Sony has managed to close the gap a substantial amount although they are still losing money. BusinessWeek reported this week that the PS3 now costs around $400 USD to manufacture and that Sony will only lose $1.4 billion USD in its gaming division for 2007 compared to $2.1 billion USD for 2006.

    Production cost drops have been attributed to a few new advances in technology as well as higher supply. Firstly, the Cell Broadband Engine chip was shrunk to 65nm. The blue-violet laser diodes used for the Blu-ray drive have also seen a huge increase in yield and supply. Sony also removed the backwards compatibility engine for PS2 titles from its 40GB unit, dropping production costs even further.

    Sony Entertainment boss Kazuo Hirai explained at CES that the gaming division hopes to be profitable by the next fiscal year."
    Source:http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/12567.cfm
     
  2. Linkiboy

    Member Linkiboy GBAtemp Testing Area

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,888
    Country:
    United States
    I think they'd keep it at the same price so they can recover some of that billion of which they lost.
     
  3. GameDragon

    Member GameDragon Mugiwara RAWR!

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2005
    Messages:
    1,355
    Location:
    New York
    Country:
    United States
    Yeah, it wouldn't make sense to drop the price again. At least not now.
     
  4. science

    Member science science rules

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,695
    Country:
    Canada
    Losing $1,400,000,000 is good news?
     
  5. Grimalkin

    Member Grimalkin Waaaaaaaah!

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,173
    Country:
    Canada
    A lot better than 2,100,000,000.
     
  6. OSW

    Former Staff OSW Wii King

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,796
    Country:
    Australia
    but alot worse than nintendos $$$$$$$$$$$ profit
     
  7. TaMs

    Member TaMs Randomizer

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,126
    Country:
    Finland
    Atleast they're not only thinking profit like nintendo. : D
     
  8. Hit

    Member Hit GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    813
    Country:
    Netherlands
    Consoles always are made for profit, i don't care if Sony wants to waste money
    But that procedure is not normal
     
  9. shinji257

    Member shinji257 61396C68206D61737465722072616365 :3

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    322
    Country:
    United States
    Actually that is quite opposite to what I was told. Consoles are usually made at a loss to the company but the idea is that they can make up those losses in game sales. This would explain why games are so dang expensive. $60 per game??? Ouch. Unfortunately I have no intention on buying a PS3 until FF13 comes out and there is no guarantee that I will buy the console even if the game does come out.
     
  10. Linkiboy

    Member Linkiboy GBAtemp Testing Area

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,888
    Country:
    United States
    Games used to be even more expensive than 60$.
     
  11. shinji257

    Member shinji257 61396C68206D61737465722072616365 :3

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2007
    Messages:
    322
    Country:
    United States
    When were they $60??? I remember when they were $40. Last gen games had started at $50 when they initially came out.
     
  12. beedog19

    Member beedog19 GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    Sunny Southern California
    Country:
    United States
    I believe the occasional SNES game would retail for over $60 with some (Final Fantasy) reaching around $70. I'm sure there's someone here who knows better than I since I was still pretty young during the SNES days.
     
  13. Hadrian

    Former Staff Hadrian Better than Craigslist

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2004
    Messages:
    16,978
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Well I dunno about US gamers but us Brits were royally ripped off, I remember Street Fighter 2 being £70 when released here. I think in the late 90's Nintendo got fined for ripping us off.
     
  14. BoneMonkey

    Banned BoneMonkey The cheese stash is a lie.

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Messages:
    3,226
    Location:
    USA
    Country:
    United States
    now that blueray one there will be no price drops anytime soon

    i say in 2 years the ps3 will be 199.99
     
  15. Grimalkin

    Member Grimalkin Waaaaaaaah!

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,173
    Country:
    Canada
    A lot of companies don't make money for developing systems. They make most of the money from the addons/peripherals. Same as when a company develops a game system, they make most of the money from marketing advertising and the games they develop.
     
  16. Dio

    Member Dio WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Messages:
    556
    Location:
    Mount Vernon, WA
    Country:
    United States
    Back in the N64 days, retailers charged $60-70 per game. Then people figured out they could buy games cheaper online, so it wasn't that much of a problem... Except for us kids XD

    I also agree with some of the posts above. I forgot the source, but they took apart each console, priced each piece and found that each one costed $100 or more than the retail price to manufacture. Companies make money off of software, not consoles.
     
  17. JohnDrake

    Banned JohnDrake Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    188
    Location:
    Port Meirion
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Confirmed false.

    On a side note, nothing says failure and desperation like a $300 price drop within the first year of a console's lifespan.

    (^Translation: Sony isn't dumb.)

    It's really too bad. I wish I was wrong about this as I have a mate who is looking to jump in. (whoops, wrong system)
     
  18. ZeWarrior

    Member ZeWarrior TheWarrior

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,810
    Country:
    Brazil

    It's not desperation. Sony's managed to get the PS3 down to only $400 to manufacturer, why the fuck would they keep it at $600? Besides Both the 360 and PS3 need to be at a $300 sku.
     
  19. JohnDrake

    Banned JohnDrake Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    188
    Location:
    Port Meirion
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    [​IMG]

    Yeah, sure its not.
     
  20. amptor

    Banned amptor Banned

    Joined:
    May 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,554
    Country:
    United States
    good thing we don't have floods of lamers these days boasting that "piracy would help Sony sell video games" because that is a flat out lie.

    What would help is if the damn bluray wasn't so expensive, then they could lower production costs quite a bit. I think the drive alone cost $129, whereas a dual layer dvd reader costs maybe about $3-$5 to manufacture these days. See huge price difference?

    Microsoft took the cheap way out, they knew you dind't need 50GB for games these days, it is too early for that. All you'd end up doing is filling that 50 gig with FMV for the most part. Sure some RPG need maybe 3 dual layer discs but that's still cheaper than one bluray.

    I for one am waiting for the PS3 to be cheap because I have enough consoles to keep me more than busy. Will buy one when the time is right, but that time is not right now. Of course I could afford one, but I'm looking at a big black piece of plastic that I wouldn't even use.
     

Share This Page