Homebrew ALL 3 Methods to get unbanned from recent ban wave
- Thread starter gamemasteru03
- Start date
- Views 514,351
- Replies 2,126
- Likes 60
If you mean banned I guess nintendo dosent care but I will imagine it soon will be.
Will there ever be? And can someone explain to me why we cant access pokemon bank but we can access the eshop with a different seed? Sorry im homebrew dumb sometimes....obviously why im banned in the first place lol
Most eShop features don't require an NNID, so if you delete your NNID off the 3DS by injecting the zeroed NNID file, you can still use some eShop features. Your Pokemon Bank requires your NNID, which you cannot use.
While there might be a way to get your Pokemon back someday, you should assume there won't ever be, so don't hold your breath.
Technically, there is a way, but the code hasn't been implemented into anything public. It requires a sacrificial system, and A9LH. The reason why you can still access the eShop but not Pokebank is because Pokebank requires an NNID, and you can't link an NNID to a banned console (022-2812). The device's ID itself is banned, and this can't be (permanently) changed due to this part being OTP locked. A developer here made a modification to Luma that changed the ID to 1234 in RAM, but Nintendo caught on and now requires legitimate IDs signed by CTCert. So, to totally unban a console (in memory only) one has to dump the CTCert and device ID from the ITCM (ARM9 RAM) from an unbanned console, and inject them into the ITCM of a banned one using an A9LH payload. This is why a sacrificial 3DS is required (it can technically still be used, but going online with it could be detrimental). However, even after doing all of this, the NNID that was being used when the console was banned can never be used again due to it being tied to the original device ID, and Nintendo seems to be reluctant to relinquish these NNIDs. If you try using your old ID with an injected ID then you'll get a whole new error. So, there's no hope of getting your Pokemon back. All you can do is cut your losses and move on.
Last edited by Joom,
But say someone does not have access to physical games and is only able to download games online, or the banned user wants to play an older game that has raised up significantly in value for whatever reason. Now the only way the user is able play the preferred game is to pirate the game unless saving a substantial amount of money to play the game. Corporations do not think this way simply because they have money to throw around and have never experienced such grief.
And that's where the last thing comes into play, don't get ban and none of that will affect you. That said let's be real here the people who got ban most likely weren't going to buy the game and the people who bought the game but weren't patient enough are in the minority in fact from all the threads only about 3 people gave evidence that they are In fact not actual pirates and just wanted to play a little early. So the basics is pirates will continue to be pirates and because of pirates and cheaters bans will continue to happen. I see nothing wrong with this as the saying goes you play with fire and you're bound to get burned.
Unless of course you can burn hotter than the fire itself. Nintendo's ban was rather abysmal.
Agreed not letting you transfer your nnid to a newly brought 200 doller console is way to harsh.
What I meant by that is that the ban was incredibly easy to circumvent, and I felt kind of embarrassed for Nintendo after what a temper tantrum this ban obviously was. No hardware modifications or anything outside of the scope of A9LH was required except for a secondary console. I'm excited for the bootrom to be dumped because I'd like to know if we can manipulate CTCert directly, thus removing the necessity for a second console.
Yeah and the sad thing is they dont give a crap because the public seed has been alive for almost 2 months.
Yea it was a pretty bad ban but I don't think they have the system in place for super permanent bans. That said, sacrificing a second console has always been a way to unban a console and I don't think there's anyway around it. I don't know about the current gen but pretty much everything else has been able to get unban by sacrificing another console but for sure they going to be stricter with the new console even if only slightly. I also wouldn't be surprised that moving forward they will straight up ban the actual nnid kinda like Sony sometimes bans the actual account but for the most part hacked consoles get away with a hardware ban most of the time.
This specific ban is what's known as a "hyperban". This includes the LFCS and the device ID itself, and as far as we can tell it is permanent. The likelihood of it being lifted is next to nothing. They also kind of sort of permanently banned NNIDs by keeping them locked to the banned ID. It can still be used on a Wii U or their site, but it can never be used on another 3DS.
That's the difference I meant, when Sony ( I'm talking about Sony since I have more experience with their bans) does a full I fucking hate you ban, the account won't work no matter if you have a PSV and a ps3 on top of the system ban. That's why I don't call the current hyper ban of Nintendo a super permanent ban since the offending nnid can still be used on their other consoles except on another 3ds.
I have no idea how the PSN works, but I imagine that certain purchases (like PS1 games) are interchangeable on Sony's systems. Like, if you buy a PS1 game on a Vita you'll also be allowed to download it on your PS3/4. Am I right? Feel free to correct me. This ain't the case with Nintendo, though. If you buy an SNES VC title on the 3DS you have to buy it again on the Wii U. So, I imagine this is why Nintendo does bans the way they do. It's kind of dumb, but also kind of smart since it still allows customers to throw money at them.
Similar threads
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Jayro:
Eventhough the New 3DS XL is more powerful, I still feel like the DS Lite was a more polished system. It's a real shame that it never got an XL variant keeping the GBA slot. You'd have to go on AliExpress and buy an ML shell to give a DS phat the unofficial "DS Lite" treatment, and that's the best we'll ever get I'm afraid.+1 -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.+1
-
@
SylverReZ:
They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite+1
for people with beefy hands. -
-
-
-
