- Joined
- Apr 24, 2009
- Messages
- 2,941
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 110
- Trophies
- 1
- Age
- 29
- Location
- In Vulpes' Fur
- Website
- meekpicture.blogspot.com
- XP
- 658
- Country

Oh.. my.. fuck. Your argument fails. On so many levels.RoyalCardMan said:I feel your trying to insult me. First of all, this is one thing to let you know.Psyfira said:I got that from your earlier posts, notice I said "creationism / evolution".RoyalCardMan said:And I don't really believe in the theory of evolution. It is kind of an athiest theory. Most of it tries to prove that not God made all things, but the world itself did. They try to say the universe just happened. Well, somewhat that goes against the idea that "Every action has an equal reaction". Well, look at it this way. God being all powerful and strong, he created a really beatiful, fantastic, I can't even describe it, Universe. Now, the Big Bang theory doesn't go with this idea of science. They theorized that this big mass just exploded out of no where and made the universe.Psyfira said:... If a world contains 95% water for instance, the dominant race would be some kind of aquatic creature and creationism / evolution would go from there...
So, in conclusion, the Evolution theory is more of an idea to turn peopel away from God. Well, yes chimps have 99% of their DNA matching ours, but what about that 1%. I mean, there are lots of species that are closely related to each other, but we don't say that they came from each other.
Now, back on topic. Yes, you have some points there. The other argument I could lay against you is that the Bible said "his image" not images.
So, it is an ongoing debate.I'm taking the middle ground here, and you can believe whichever of the two you want. I'm not going to push what I believe off onto you. I will point out (as others have) that evolution / Big Bang Theory doesn't turn people away from God, because if theoretically the process was true then something must have started it and that could easily be a God or divine being of some sort.![]()
As for "his image", now we're wandering into the territory of validity of the Bible and I feel we're going a little off-topic for a discussion about life on other worlds.
(To clarify my views I'm a scientist, I believe in the evidence in front of me when it comes to evolution, I have no idea if there's a God upstairs or not, and frankly I don't care. But I'm sensitive to your views and trying to think objectively around the issue, because I'm open minded like that.)
Open mindeness can lead to liberalism(if you are liberal, I still respect you though for being human, for all humans made in God's image have dignity, meaning I must respect you).
And, actually this topic is also a religious debate, and for being a scientist I thought you would have known that. And, yes the Big Bang theory does go towards Athiasm(Sorry if I spelled that wrong). In the Bible, it says he created all things as if spontanious. The Big Bang theory is an ignorant theory because it tries to prove either that God is not as all mighty as the universe(which doesn't make sense because he did create the universe) or it tries to prove that God did not exist and that a huge explosion caused the universe to form.
According to you: Atheism, liberalism, evolution, Darwinism, Physics, Science, Big Bang Theory, Behavioral Science, are all wrong. Your entire argument is based on the notion that all of these are wrong. Which they are not.
So apparently, atheism is wrong? And every single scientific theory that mildly contradicts against the literal interpretation of God is wrong? So what you're saying is, that "God" couldn't have just been the one that made the Big Bang or something? That seems perfectly plausible to me even though I don't really believe in it.









