I found a few plot holes that kind of ruined the game for me (at least on the story side of things). First off at the end of the game we found out that Ravio was not clueless, he knew what he was doing coming to Hyrule and finding you from the start, he just let you believe other wise.
My first question is how did he even get to Hyrule? It is true that he had procession of the bracelet to begin with but when he gives it to you it is not functional. So unless he drained all it's power while coming to Hyrule how the heck did he get there? So the only explanation is when he had the bracelet it had only a little bit of power left it in for one time use. That might be the case as like in the end scene of the game Hilda said the bracelet has just enough power to send Link and Zelda back to Hyrule.
The first plot hole is explainable in a way but this one I have no idea how it could happen, that being at the end of the game how did Ravio get back to Lorule? Link had the bracelet and Lorule isn't accessible without using the wall painting ability. Just how? Any theories? or am I just blind to something so obvious?
My first question is how did he even get to Hyrule? It is true that he had procession of the bracelet to begin with but when he gives it to you it is not functional. So unless he drained all it's power while coming to Hyrule how the heck did he get there? So the only explanation is when he had the bracelet it had only a little bit of power left it in for one time use. That might be the case as like in the end scene of the game Hilda said the bracelet has just enough power to send Link and Zelda back to Hyrule.
The first plot hole is explainable in a way but this one I have no idea how it could happen, that being at the end of the game how did Ravio get back to Lorule? Link had the bracelet and Lorule isn't accessible without using the wall painting ability. Just how? Any theories? or am I just blind to something so obvious?