mysticwaterfall said:
As I keep saying, if Nintendo can detect flashcarts, why would they just log and not block them? In regards to DS games, I see no situation where you can detect a flashcart and not block it. Nintendo blocked all flashcarts originally on the 3DS. Flashcarts updated, so now they work. If they work, they are not detected. If they are not detected, they are not logged (except as whatever game they pretend to be). So the only thing it could possibly ever do is log an attempted flashcart use that is blocked. Easy away around this - don't use a flashcart on updated firmware until your flashcart has been updated.
This whole thing is a scare tactic and nothing more, the end. As has also been mentioned in other threads, there's too much liability all around for it to be anywhere near practical, as I've said above, anywhere near feasible.
Amen. The 3DS will log the flash cart as whatever game it spoofs as, not that it was a flash cart. If the 3DS detected that it was damn flash cart it wouldn't bot the freakin' thing!!!
QUOTE(spiritofcat @ Mar 22 2011, 08:45 PM) I find it interesting that they have changed the wording from may to will.
If they say that using unauthorised accessories will render the game and/or system unplayable, then as soon as someone uses an unauthorised accessory and the game and system remain playable it makes a lie of their statement.
And if you touch yourself god will strike you dead. The first time you try smoking you will get cancer. Trolls will come and steal you away in the night if your bad. Yeah...
Rydian's post is largely correct. NO company has a right to destroy your purchased goods (read: property) because you did something they didn't like w/ it. If I take my Honda Civic (I don't really own a Civic) mud bogging and post video on YouTube, Honda can't send some thugs to disable my car because of the inevitable bad press about how a Civic performs in the mud.
Fast6191 should be in here soon w/ a Accolade vs. Sega reference. He's right, though the DMCA has melted some of that ruling a bit. No offense, Fast, I almost referenced it myself. :-)
Sony isn't going after GeoHot for hacking his console. They know they don't have a leg to stand on w/ that angle. They are going after him because he joined and used PSN and by doing so promised not to hack or modify his console.
They're trying to sue him for violating the TOS agreement for PSN and recover damages for the money they lost by him posting the keys. They say they're going after Fail0verflow, but again, they don't have a leg to stand on. Those guys may have hacked the console, but they don't have PSN accounts promising they won't and they haven't violated any TOS. Their non-PSN'ed PS3's never signed them up for the law suit.
Posting "illegal numbers", isn't BTW. Ask Hollywood about the DVD key.
Void your warranty? Yes. Charge you for removal of hacks? Yes. Brick your console because you ran homebrew? No. Brick your console because you ran ROMz? No.
Windows "Genuine Advantage" would, most certainly at minimum, remove Windows (but not your data) from your HD if it detected a invalid license if that were true. And if the fear mongers were right, it would render your hardware that you were running your pirated copy of Windows on unusable/broken/destroyed. I'm not a MS fan boy, but if anyone has the lawyers to make that case, MS does. There isn't a company on the planet that has their software pirated more than MS. If it were even remotely legal to brick your stuff because you used an "unauthorized device/software" on it, it would have already been done...
Instead they just ban you from their online services.