That is possibly the worst analogy I have heard in a while on so many levels.
Martial arts, especially Bruce Lee's stuff (seriously look up his philosophy and everything that led to jeet kune do), is usually all about compare and contrast, and if someone has something better than you then you go learn it/get it taught. Likewise watch the behind the scenes of any number of Jackie Chan films and you will see him and the martial artists on set learn and debate things.
Beyond that this is not martial arts; you are attempting to convey a message, and frequently not to native
How do you know yours is perfectly understandable? Most people can read what they themselves wrote. On the flip side any language learner or studier anywhere will tell you that slang, typos, malformed expressions and idioms are some of the hardest things to get to grips with in doing languages. If anecdote works as well then if you credit me with some capability in the language then I am telling you what you write is slow and tedious to read at very best and requires serious active thought regardless.
I realise I am not without flaws in this arena either (my penchant for verbosity and flowery phrasing tending to make things harder than might be ideal for those not already versed in such patterns of speech), however I try to hold it back and will go again if I failed to do so. To be defiant in it would just be a dick move.
Is this the same thing as the Wii U failed because of its name?