[Rumor] Wall Street Journal claims Nintendo will release both an enhanced and budget model Switch

Switch-WSJ_10-04-18.jpg

The Wall Street Journal is back to reporting Nintendo Switch rumors once more, following up on their October 2018 claim that Nintendo would be releasing a new hardware revision of the Switch in 2019. Originally, they stated that the Switch would focus on peripheral additions similar to Labo, rather than new hardware, before changing their initial stance to state that a "better" Switch revision was on the way, and would focus on upgraded hardware. This time around, their claim has a few more details--now mentioning two potential variations: a cheaper model which would replace the Nintendo 3DS as the budget option, and an enhanced model, which would be "targeted at avid video gamers".

This conflicts with previous recent statements from both the Nintendo JP president Shuntaro Furukawa and the soon to be former president of Nintendo of America, Reggie Fils-Aime, who separately debunked new hardware rumors by saying "[it] is not Nintendo's current focus".

Right now, as we go into our second holiday, my focus is making sure the current grey and neon Switch continue to have momentum in the market place. You saw systems, whether it’s our own or competitive home console systems, utilize that tactic a bit later in the life cycle. So right now, the current execution of Nintendo Switch with the Joy-Con and all of the capabilities, that’s our focus right now.

The Wall Street Journal further asserts that these two supposed hardware revisions would be "different from the original, and you would be surprised," with both versions launching as early as Summer 2019. According to the WSJ's insider sources, hardware prototypes have already been sent to software developers, who say that the "upgraded" Switch model won't be as strong as the Xbox One X or PlayStation 4 Pro.

WSJ said:
Nintendo Co. plans to launch two new versions of its Switch gaming console as early as this summer, people familiar with the matter said, as the company seeks to sustain sales momentum for the product going into a crucial third year.

What are your thoughts? Do you find the Wall Street Journal to be reliable, or have other rumors of new Switch hardware got you convinced? Are you more skeptical, after already hearing the WSJ's initial story, or do you believe that there's no room for doubt after so many claims of a revised Switch model have been circulating across the internet? With sales of the Nintendo 3DS slowing down, and the company having just barely missed the mark on its 20 million sales fiscal year projection, a new "pro" and "budget" model could be just what they need to get more sales rolling.

:arrow: Source
 

DeslotlCL

GBAtemp's scalie trash
Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
2,847
Trophies
0
XP
2,755
Country
United States
Just enjoy the games at mo loads of time until a new model arrives prob can complete 5 or 6 games by then and we got yoshi next week if Yr into tht game
I mean, i do enjoy it. I mostly use it for mario kart 8 deluxe and fortnite, but a more powerful model, perhaps with a better screen for portable mode would have helped a lot from the start...
 

Windaga

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
1,189
Trophies
1
Age
35
Location
New England
XP
2,772
Country
United States
I wouldn't mind if they released a stronger, larger Switch - I think it makes perfect sense. I just hope they also release some kind of powered dock that's compatible with older Switch models. Or if the update itself is actually the dock, and the two new models are just size and QoL updates, like Bluetooth audio, a built in microphone, more comfortable joycons, etc .
 

Rahkeesh

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
2,178
Trophies
1
Age
42
XP
3,261
Country
United States
The dock would still need to be included otherwise we would get brand confusion (“they said you could play it on the tv!”),

You'd think that not including a dock or removable controllers would get the point across. I'll admit they need as bold a name as the 2DS though.

and having joy cons locked into the switch prevents any ability to replace or buy new joy cons -something Nintendo would definitely want consumers to do.

Why stop at just replacing the joy-cons when you can make them replace the entire system? See the 3DS crappy c-pads or DS lite shoulder buttons.
 

KiiWii

Editorial Team
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
16,636
Trophies
3
Website
defaultdnb.github.io
XP
27,072
Country
United Kingdom
I would like to see:

Full 1080p or higher in portable.
Bigger screen.
In game chat, properly.
Wireless HDMI (no more dock)
Bigger joycons.
Customisable joycons (layout of buttons/stick etc)
N64 / GC / Wii VC native.

/I wish
 

Kubas_inko

"Something funny goes here."
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
6,324
Trophies
1
Age
24
Location
I gues on earth.
XP
5,209
Country
Czech Republic
I would like to see:

Full 1080p or higher in portable.
Bigger screen.
In game chat, properly.
Wireless HDMI (no more dock)
Bigger joycons.
Customisable joycons (layout of buttons/stick etc)
N64 / GC / Wii VC native.

/I wish
Wireless HDMI would be horrible. Just imagine the latency.
1080p - battery
 

DANTENDO

I Won year sub Edge mag 1996 hot topic digitiser
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2019
Messages
2,680
Trophies
1
XP
2,361
Country
United Kingdom
If they make a bigger Switch it will make all current joy cons and Labo instantly useless. Not to mention heavy since the current one already isn't too light and hurts my hands after a while.

They'll probably make a more powerful Switch with the same form factor.
I don't kno why Yr hands hurt while holding the switch I've seen you throw Mario with no issues:lol:
 

huma_dawii

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
3,880
Trophies
2
Age
33
Location
Planet Earth
XP
4,270
Country
United States
I would like to see:

Full 1080p or higher in portable.
Bigger screen.
In game chat, properly.
Wireless HDMI (no more dock)
Bigger joycons.
Customisable joycons (layout of buttons/stick etc)
N64 / GC / Wii VC native.

/I wish
Wireless HDMI would be horrible. Just imagine the latency.
1080p - battery


This is something I think it's actually coming, it was rumored for the NX way before it launched.

Don't worry about lag of any kind, as this technology is the same as the Wii U Gamepad video codecs and stuff... basically is that technology built in a dongle you connect to the TV making this a wireless display.

I wouldn't discard the possibility specially when Nintendo already has patents for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KiiWii

Kubas_inko

"Something funny goes here."
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
6,324
Trophies
1
Age
24
Location
I gues on earth.
XP
5,209
Country
Czech Republic
This is something I think it's actually coming, it was rumored for the NX way before it launched.

Don't worry about lag of any kind, as this technology is the same as the Wii U Gamepad video codecs and stuff... basically is that technology built in a dongle you connect to the TV making this a wireless display.

I wouldn't discard the possibility specially when Nintendo already has patents for it.
Wii U gamepad had a noticeable lag (at least I was able to notice it) but a really small one. But with wireless HDMI, I don't think your hands would happy if you had to hold your switch as a gamepad. You would also still need to charge it.
 
Last edited by Kubas_inko,

huma_dawii

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
3,880
Trophies
2
Age
33
Location
Planet Earth
XP
4,270
Country
United States
Wii U gamepad had a noticeable lag (at least I was able to notice it) but a really small one. But with wireless HDMI, I don't think your hands would happy if you had to hold your switch as a gamepad...

It did not have lag, you probable played like 20 feet away from
your TV xD

There are tons of videos on YouTube stating that in some cases even the Gamepad video was faster and responsive than some people Tvs.

http://nintendotoday.com/wii-u-gamepad-lag-test/
 
Last edited by huma_dawii,

bowser

Mwa ha ha ha!
Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
2,377
Trophies
1
Age
37
Location
GBAtemp ↑↑↓↓← → ← →BA
XP
2,589
Country
India
Wii U gamepad had a noticeable lag (at least I was able to notice it) but a really small one. But with wireless HDMI, I don't think your hands would happy if you had to hold your switch as a gamepad. You would also still need to charge it.

You have to put your TV in game mode to get rid of the lag.
 

Veho

The man who cried "Ni".
Former Staff
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
11,391
Trophies
3
Age
42
Location
Zagreb
XP
41,477
Country
Croatia
You'd think that not including a dock or removable controllers would get the point across. I'll admit they need as bold a name as the 2DS though.
They need to really hammer home the point that it can't switch between modes (handheld -- home console), and is instead stuck in just one mode... So instead of Switch they should call it...

Nintendo Stuck.
 

DeslotlCL

GBAtemp's scalie trash
Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2015
Messages
2,847
Trophies
0
XP
2,755
Country
United States
The Switch is already relatively budget friendly. So, seeing a budget option is unlikely in my mind. Although, an upgraded model would certainly be nice. But not make the original obsolete.
Relatively budget friendly? Considering they charge an insane amount for a plastic with an hdmi and usb ports? What about the insane price of both joycons? The switch is anything but budget friendly, especially when you also want to get a few games with it.
 

geodeath

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
300
Trophies
0
Location
London
XP
752
Country
Well, going from a fairly significant underclock to an overclock would actually make quite a bit of difference, but again there's the problem of cooling solution. Plus battery life concerns. Unless they go stationary with the "Switch Pro," which would seemingly defeat the purpose of Switch to begin with. Lots of reasons to doubt this is actually going to be a thing.

I have been saying since the switch's launch, that it made more sense to have one more powerful version for 'home' use and one less powerful for playing on the go, without the malarkey of removable joycons and so on. They would substitute the stupid joycons (for home play they are ridiculous, they do not even provide a charging method) for the pro controller and instead of the screen and battery, you could get the extra juice. If not for the same price, for a little bit more, including the savings from the parts you do not use.
It makes complete sense. I do not play mobile, at all, never. My switch is underpowered to compete at home, for the main reason of being able to be played mobile. Even docked, it's a tablet processor. It would make more sense to have an X2 from the beginning (if not even better), then X1 on the portable. Then games are profile'd differently between the 2 versions aka Xbox One vs Xbox One X. This way, the people who care about gaming on the go, can take one over the other or even both.

This does not defeat the purpose of the switch at all. Games could still 'continue' on the mobile device after putting the 'pro' to sleep, much like viber can continue a call from the desktop to the mobile when heading out. Games could autosave their state and use the network as a resuming point or whatever.

I mean, there are mobile phones more powerful than the Switch now, and its only 2 years old.

But Nintendo love to sell the same hardware 10 times in each generation, so not impressed or surprised at all if thats the case. :D
 

James310

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
977
Trophies
0
Location
Somewhere in California
XP
883
Country
United States
Mayb anyone who bought the original switch and can send in proof by receipt nintendo could offer a 25 percent discount on the new model
GameStop almost always does a upgrade trade in deal , I got my New 3ds XL preorder at $90 when I traded in my regular 3ds during that deal, they will likely do the same for any future Switch upgrades for limited time...
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    ZeroT21 @ ZeroT21: :lol: