Hardware Switch costs roughly $257 to manufacture

  • Thread starter Xzi
  • Start date
  • Views 8,197
  • Replies 116
  • Likes 4

smf

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
6,647
Trophies
2
XP
5,894
Country
United Kingdom
They just have to keep getting new bundles with new games to devaluate the older ones and cleanup the market of old units, like they do with N3DS.

Or use cheaper and slightly inferior screens in newer models, which will encourage people to buy the older ones while they can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Urbanshadow

Enteking

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2016
Messages
99
Trophies
0
Age
44
XP
121
Country
United States
My personal estimations are below 200$. If the Switch really costs that much, Nintendo did a bad design job and should have stripped expensive components like HD rumble and Joycons in order to keep costs down. Also they shouldn't have to pay fees to Microsoft for using FAT32 exfat patents.
 
Last edited by Enteking,
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

MaK11-12

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
241
Trophies
0
Location
Namek
Website
www.deltabeard.com
XP
434
Country
I wouldn't have thought that the Switch costs more that $200. Maybe the author could actually provide a BOM instead of writing an article behind a paywall?
This source is pretty how ya doin' tbh. I don't believe it.

My personal estimations are below 200$. If the Switch really costs that much, Nintendo did a bad design job and should have stripped expensive components like HD rumble and Joycons in order to keep costs down. Also they shouldn't have to pay fees to Microsoft for using FAT32 exfat patents.

If they had to get a patent for exfat, they would have used something like XFS like Samsung does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

FAII

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
46
Trophies
0
XP
195
Country
The switch have voez which is only portable mode, it would be like the new3ds but backwards if they create an only docked mode console, besides the vita tv didn't go well on sales, because is Nintendo I think is possible but unlikely, probably they are going to release a switch xl and a new switch
Why would they release a Switch XL? Are there any people out there who even want a Switch XL? It's big enough, who needs a bigger handheld? Sure, some people have big hands, but that doesn't mean their eyes see the world differently.
 

omegasoul6

ಠ_ಠ
Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
515
Trophies
1
Location
Toronto
XP
1,090
Country
Canada
Not too surprising that they don't make a massive profit, considering the Nvidia Jetson TX1, which has the same Tegra X1 and 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM and only 16GB of eMMC, is sold at $435.90 USD by Nvidia and it doesn't come with a screen or two Joy-Cons or the Joy-Con Grip.
 

The Real Jdbye

*is birb*
Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
23,347
Trophies
4
Location
Space
XP
13,934
Country
Norway
I think this sounds about right. There's usually not a big profit margin for manufacturers, stores take the biggest cut (but it makes sense since they sell far fewer units so in order to make money they need a bigger profit margin)
Often consoles are even sold at a loss, but that normally hasn't been the case for Nintendo, except for the 3DS after the early price drop.

It might not seem like it, but there's a LOT of tech packed into the Switch. And the fact that the controller is in 2 separate pieces, and has to have gyros, wireless hardware, rumble, battery and such in both, as well as wired connectivity, drives up the prices, if only by a few dollars each. It seems like the main Switch unit has gyros too, one of the minigames in 1-2-Switch makes use of it. The dock is probably the cheapest part to make, it feels like it's made of really cheap plastic, and the only tech in there is a basic USB hub and MyDP converter.
 
Last edited by The Real Jdbye,
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

DrkBeam

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Messages
414
Trophies
0
Age
31
XP
397
Country
Spain
Why would they release a Switch XL? Are there any people out there who even want a Switch XL? It's big enough, who needs a bigger handheld? Sure, some people have big hands, but that doesn't mean their eyes see the world differently.
I don't know, in my opinion the original 3ds has the perfect size they didn't need an XL version of it, but the sales says the contrary even it is a 240p screen, I would prefer a smaller switch anyway, but what I read is more likely a xl version
 

Kioku

猫。子猫です!
Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
12,010
Trophies
3
Location
In the Murderbox!
Website
www.twitch.tv
XP
16,164
Country
United States
My personal estimations are below 200$. If the Switch really costs that much, Nintendo did a bad design job and should have stripped expensive components like HD rumble and Joycons in order to keep costs down. Also they shouldn't have to pay fees to Microsoft for using FAT32 exfat patents.

That's a cool opinion and all.. But I'd rather they not strip components just to please you and your wallet.
 

Alkéryn

Moon Dweller ~
Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2015
Messages
1,665
Trophies
1
Age
25
Location
Albategnius, Moon
XP
2,392
Country
France
Shield TV is still $200, so the cheapest I imagine the cost of manufacturing that to be is $150. The IPS panels on Switch plus the battery and portable form factor probably add $60 - $75 to that. The rest is likely added from the joy cons, those also being entirely new to manufacturing.


This is possible for minor revisions, but I wouldn't expect anything major for 3-4 years. The hardware is as powerful as it gets for this form factor right now.
Manufacturer don't pay the same price for pieces than normal user so even if you add the price and you end up at 257 for them it cost less than half that price
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subtle Demise

Gadd

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
212
Trophies
0
Age
45
XP
190
Country
United States
My personal estimations are below 200$. If the Switch really costs that much, Nintendo did a bad design job and should have stripped expensive components like HD rumble and Joycons in order to keep costs down. Also they shouldn't have to pay fees to Microsoft for using FAT32 exfat patents.

nope, can't lose HD rumble, love that stuff!
 

Wiisel

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
1,309
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
333
Country
Why would they release a Switch XL? Are there any people out there who even want a Switch XL? It's big enough, who needs a bigger handheld? Sure, some people have big hands, but that doesn't mean their eyes see the world differently.

Because sitting on a bus with a 42" screen on your lap would be take your gaming experience to a whole new level.
 

Gadd

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
212
Trophies
0
Age
45
XP
190
Country
United States
Why would they release a Switch XL? Are there any people out there who even want a Switch XL? It's big enough, who needs a bigger handheld? Sure, some people have big hands, but that doesn't mean their eyes see the world differently.

they probably just need to release some different shaped/sized joycons and can avoid a new system release if it's just for form factor reasons.
 

Hells Malice

Are you a bully?
Member
GBAtemp Patron
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
7,122
Trophies
3
Age
32
XP
9,271
Country
Canada
My personal estimations are below 200$. If the Switch really costs that much, Nintendo did a bad design job and should have stripped expensive components like HD rumble and Joycons in order to keep costs down. Also they shouldn't have to pay fees to Microsoft for using FAT32 exfat patents.

My personal estimation is about $40,000,000
It seems we have contradicting arbitrary numbers.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,779
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,653
Country
United States
Manufacturer don't pay the same price for pieces than normal user so even if you add the price and you end up at 257 for them it cost less than half that price
I never said they pay the same price to manufacture that customers do. This info comes from the tech analyst at WSJ, he wouldn't make a stupid mistake like that.
 

gundamu

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
251
Trophies
0
Age
33
XP
247
Country
Canada
cost is not higher then 200 dollars, reminder these companies buy the material/chips in bulk. that alone cuts the price of each material/chip.

my guesstimate 180 dollars per unit, imo they should suck it up and sell it for 50 dollar cheaper. sony sold ps3 at loss during launch.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,779
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,653
Country
United States
cost is not higher then 200 dollars, reminder these companies buy the material/chips in bulk. that alone cuts the price of each material/chip.

my guesstimate 180 dollars per unit, imo they should suck it up and sell it for 50 dollar cheaper. sony sold ps3 at loss during launch.
Well I'm glad you think you know more than the people who are paid to know these things.
 

s157

Grinder Extraordinaire
Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2016
Messages
418
Trophies
0
XP
297
Country
United States
The source of that 257 USD number is a Japanese firm called Fomalhaut. Have there been any secondary sources to confirm or deny this?
 

SuperSVGA

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
303
Trophies
1
XP
536
Country
United States
Not too surprising that they don't make a massive profit, considering the Nvidia Jetson TX1, which has the same Tegra X1 and 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM and only 16GB of eMMC, is sold at $435.90 USD by Nvidia and it doesn't come with a screen or two Joy-Cons or the Joy-Con Grip.
For one thing that's a development board so it's going to cost much more. Also, they're $299 if you're a student/educator or if you buy a large quantity. Additionally a lot of robotics teams got these for free.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Goku likes to flip the bean to get others healthy