Lunar Landing IS FAKE!

DSGamer64

Canadian, Eh?
Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
2,937
Trophies
0
Age
37
Location
A cold cold place
XP
597
Country
Canada
Mr. Awesome/WackyNinja said:
.
unsure.gif
.......Thanks for posting that man that was.....interesting. Although I didn't understand half of it. I didn't read all the stuff you guys posted cuz that would take forever ecpecialy when your on a ipod touch like me....but I think the guy who posted this is right I mean a flag that waves to the wind? When there's no wind?! How do you come up with an explanation for that? Oh and ya I think I sol part of that bid
How do you know whether or not the moon has wind? Have you been there? No, you and the billions of other people on this planet has never been there before, anyone making assumptions about the wind on the moon is an idiot.
 

Golfman560

TheRapist.com
Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
1,099
Trophies
0
Age
15
Location
Living with seals
Website
Visit site
XP
74
Country
Actually the moon has no wind, however the force of the moon orbiting the around the earth so quickly gives small objects a slight "breeze".

Edit: The quotes are necessary since space is composed of nothing. The flag moves because it has a very small mass which means momentum has a stronger effect on it.
 

CyberFish

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
141
Trophies
0
XP
36
Country
United States
QUOTE said:
If all the Apollo 11 astronauts did was touch down and plant a flag, that would have been plenty. Fulfilling humanity’s dreams needs no peer review. But their contributions were scientific, too.

A still-operative set of mirrors left by Neil Armstrong about 100 feet from his famous footprint lets scientists ‘ping’ the moon with beams of light. By tracking photons that bounce back, they’ve made centimeter-scale measurements of the moon’s distance from Earth, and of variations in its orbit. They’ve even monitored fluctuations in the the universal force of gravity. (Good news: It’s very, very stable.) Instruments carried by Apollo 11 also measured solar wind and seismic activity. But perhaps the most compelling insights were geological, based on a box full of lunar rocks and some soil packed in by Neil Armstrong to keep the contents from bumping.

“When they came back, everybody was interested in the big rocks, but that soil, which was fine-grained stuff, is just a treasure trove,” said Randy Korotev, a University of Wisconsin lunar geochemist. “The moon is a recorder of things that happen in space that you can’t get from Earth.”

In 1969, Korotev was a graduate student in the laboratory of Wisconsin geochemist Larry Haskin. He watched the moon landing from his home in Green Bay, knowing that he’d soon study the rocks on his TV screen. Forty years later, he’s still studying them.

“We learned so much, just from that first mission. There was some first-order stuff that we didn’t understand. We had never seen stuff like this lunar soil that had been exposed directly to space for billions of years. The soil and some of the aspects of it were completely unknown,” he said. “We learned how old these basaltic dark spots were. It turned out they were 3 billion years old. It’s hard to find a rock on Earth that old, and when you look at them, it’s like they happened yesterday.”

“We learned about how the solar wind implanted ions into the soil from the sun,” he continued. “That’s the kind of stuff we never have on Earth, because the solar wind is absorbed by the atmosphere. People could study the cosmic ray tracks left when a cosmic ray hits a mineral grain. You can count the cosmic interactions in a cubic millimeter — and they are coming from outside the solar system. The list of things we learned is endless. It’s so endless that I can’t even begin to give everybody’s fields justice.”

Part of that list was contained in an issue of Science released on Jan. 30, 1970. It contains over 400 pages of research on Apollo 11 samples, and in commemoration of the landing’s 40th anniversary is now freely available in its entirety. (Among my favorite parts is the elegantly titled “Ages, Irradiation History, and Chemical Composition of Lunar Rocks from the Sea of Tranquillity,” and an advertisement for the J.T. Baker Chemical Company’s ULTREX Phosophorous Pentoxide, with “key trace metal impurities in the parts per trillion range.”)

Research on the Apollo 11 samples is still very much alive, said Korotev.

“There are types of measurements that we can make today that we couldn’t 40 years ago. The questions keep changing,” he said. “I’ve been doing this for 40 years, and I get excited every time I send a new batch of samples off to be analyzed.”

Note: Another fascinating document is the Apollo 11 Preliminary Science Report, published by NASA on Oct. 31, 1969. It describes the setup of the various experiments, and also contains an article entitled, “Crew Observations.” Its language is dryer than the “one giant leap for mankind,” but no less inspirational.

“The Apollo 11 mission offered us our first opportunity to observe directly the operational and scientific phenomena associated with landing on the lunar surface,” wrote Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin and Michael Collins. “A large amount of fine lunar material appeared to be moved during the terminal phase of landin…. The path of this expelled material was parallel to the lunar surface, and the material seemed to travel at a great distance (over the horizon) at a high velocity.”

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/07/apollo11science/

We landed on the moon. Sorry
wacko.gif
people.

Also, one of you got in Buzz's face about it. Im sure he regrets it now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ez-NpFVwQw

These nuts annoy me. The lunar landing, whatever. Once they start saying 9/11 is an inside job, that makes me nuts and start slapping them around with cold hard facts, and they STILL wont give up. Just goes to show they live in
wacko.gif
world.
 

da_head

A dying dream..
Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
2,944
Trophies
0
Age
33
Location
Toronto, Canader!
Website
Visit site
XP
353
Country
Canada
Guild McCommunist said:
You should've watched Mythbusters an hour ago. They disproved that the lunar landing was fake. You may say "THE GOVERNMENT MADE THEM SAY THAT", but that's what any idiotic fuckhead conspiracy theorist will say when confronted with the truth.
this.

and honestly, people need better things to do with their lives.
 

Ferrariman

Hip-Flop and cRap
Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
3,350
Trophies
0
Location
Canader.
XP
152
Country
Canada
:|

Really?

I love conspiracy theories because they make shitty claims like "Oh hur hur hur there are no stars, I've never heard of contrast" and "Oh hyuk hyuk hyuk theres no blast craters and noise because I am not familiar with the way space craft propel themselves in space."

Dammit this guy just said there is no air on the moon and then says that the "Rocket Engine" on the craft would blow all the dust away.
 

Maat

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
33
Trophies
0
XP
99
Country
Brazil
There's one reason for me to belive that man didn't went to the moon...
Have you ver done a circuit in TTL Logic? In all my classes experiencies they sometimes didn't worked for apparently no reason... and sometimes they started to work... and there always something you forgot to think that it makes not work and when you debug you never know what it is......
They used that circuits to go to moon....I can conceive that....

But i really belive that they went to the moon...
 

cruddybuddy

Group: Banned!
Banned
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Messages
2,863
Trophies
0
Age
45
Location
California
Website
varpness.com
XP
171
Country
United States
Point a laser at the moon. There is a man-made reflector there that shines the laser back. Duh.

Oh, and use a high-powered telescope and you can see all the crap we left up there. That's right, AMERICAN'S made it to the moon baby.

SO, EAT IT!!!
 

Maat

Active Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
33
Trophies
0
XP
99
Country
Brazil
cruddybuddy said:
Point a laser at the moon. There is a man-made reflector there that shines the laser back. Duh.

Oh, and use a high-powered telescope and you can see all the crap we left up there. That's right, AMERICAN'S made it to the moon baby.

SO, EAT IT!!!

Man goes to the moon ans what it does.... left some crap and goes away....lol....man looks like dog....
 

[M]artin

.
Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
3,658
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
995
Country
United States
Maat said:
cruddybuddy said:
Point a laser at the moon. There is a man-made reflector there that shines the laser back. Duh.

Oh, and use a high-powered telescope and you can see all the crap we left up there. That's right, AMERICAN'S made it to the moon baby.

SO, EAT IT!!!

Man goes to the moon ans what it does.... left some crap and goes away....lol....man looks like dog....
wat.

Man goes to the moon and what does he do? Leaves some crap behind and then goes away. lol. Man exhibits dog-like behavior in this way.

yay.gif
 

MaHe

one lazy schmo
Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2006
Messages
1,101
Trophies
0
Location
Maribor
Website
Visit site
XP
336
Country
Slovenia
*sigh* ... not again. NASA made it to the Moon. Space 'colonization' was one of the key aspects of Cold War and flying a man there was the grand trophy. If there was a slightest doubt of it being a hoax, the Soviet Union would be first one to deny it. But they didn't - because they could observe it from Earth themselves. And they congratulated the Americans for the successful landing. Remember, that was at the peak of Cold War.

P.S.: I've watched every Lunar-landing-was-a-hoax videos there is, believe me. And it's all the same flawed, baseless conjecture. If there is one thing I despise more than religious fundamentalists, it's the crazy conspiracy theorists. I'm particulary amused when they tend to insult people with morons or sheeple. Oh, the irony.
rolleyes.gif
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty: (i was allowed to do that)