Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[tabzer]

I answered the question.

Don't be a coward. The question is: how does @AmandaRose 's stupid quote read when posted in response to that other thing you described?

You guys want to "wah wah" all the time and not be accountable for your own actions.

..oh I just thought because you presenting fake and misleading information ..that I would also... sorry I misunderstood.. are you saying only you can present that or can anyone?

I've not done that either.

 

[White_Raven_X]

..oh I just thought because you presenting fake and misleading information ..that I would also... sorry I misunderstood.. are you saying only you can present that or can anyone?

 

[djpannda]

I've not done that either.

.. no...... I think you might be confused... Do you know what day of the week it is? Do you where you are or your name? ... IS there someone I can call to pick you up?

 

[tabzer]

Sorry - this: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...sent-mass-adjudication-giving-individuals-ma/

Is just crazy conjecture.

"68% error rate (what are we talking about computers, what the eff is 'error rate?') means that 68% of votes are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder. “The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained."

Language is important. They are sent to where people can change the votes, means its more than a hypothetical? You have proof for that?

What is this, an effeing deranged magical formula?

"We found 68% error rate" -- error for what?! -- which means bulk adjunction -- "which means computer or people at the other place can change votes"?

What?

Things I want to see in a report like that:

1. What does 68% failure rate mean? Seriously. Dont use that as a trigger term, explain.
2. Dont qualify "what bulk adjunctions means" as that machines or humans can change the vote. What does it mean for the internal voting process? Im sure the description for the people in the voting committee is not 'we do this so machines or people can change the vote later'.
3. if you bring such a statement as a fact and not as a hypothetical (where people or machines could potentially change votes later), then you have proof for that I presume? No?

So all ofh that 'news' is crazy, and I mean crazy, fucking conjecture (someone forcing meaning into a thing, that doesnt mean that thing in the first place).

So is effing 'error rate' to beginn with, if you dont explain - error rate of what? Dont use the term 'error rate' on its own to fish for people rattled by the notion that their democracy is stolen from under their eyes, and make the term itself 'proof' for something that didnt go well.

As said before - if your electoral bodies are too naive to set up a proper democratic election, part of the conclusion is - well I guess, that you arent able to have one. So if someone sees '65% error rate' of something - surely they have a process to deal with that.

Also 'of something' is important as well - what is that?
-

Thats followed by camera shots of paper receipts that show 3 people voting, and then 300 people voting - what is that?

Forget the paper receipts, formulate a story of what has happened here - and lets hear both sides.

Dont push photos to social media, label them scandal, OMG 65% error rate, and then let emotion take over starting from the people that have a suspension of disbelieve even down to the level of someone telling them, everything they see is proof of abuse of the electoral system.
--


Also just for the final part. Lets presume 65% errorrate is a huge scandal. Error rate means proof of manipulation?

I'm from Indian phone support. We are calling from the company Microsoft. Sir, we are calling because you have a problem. Can you open System viewer and look at the error log? See - there is many errors, see, they all are red. This means, that you are being hacked, dear sir. We from the Microsoft Support noticed, and called you. Would you like the 2 or the 5 year support plan, and what is your credit card information?

Uncanny similarities..
--

The point being. Please stop throwing around Smartphone images of paperreceipts and 65% error rate, and 'where machines or humans could change the vote'. Formulate what happened from your point of view. Whole sentences. Congruent stories.

Not just 2-3 Sentence fragments, that all end up at 'we found what we knew was there', sure its not proof, but it proves that something was possible, and then...

And please, stop reading that sh*t at that level.


My believe is, that I have a feeling. That is nonsensical?

I mean, what is this. Is this a guided program for 'people with needs' to live out their 'worries', so they can exercise their demons? Is this the legislative system of the most important country in the world.

Dear Judge, something was done, thats our believe. Either in program. Or probably by someone offsite. My guess is, that it was done offsite, or internally in the program - but one of the two, one of the two definitely?

Seeing how Dominion machines work may supplement what the meaning is behind these terms.

https://streamable.com/yzrypo
https://streamable.com/u7nav7


The error rate is the system's ability to process the ballots. The report gives examples how the same ballots yielded different results and determined a error rate based off of that. Adjudication is manual editing/override. Batch adjudication isn't fully explained--but it wouldn't surprise me if the software allows to mass-edits. Adjudicated ballots should have records, but in the forensic report's case, the 2020 records were missing, but not prior records.

Dominion machines connecting to the internet may allow for remote ajudication, too. I didn't dive that deep into the report.


Oh I see, you weren't even talking about the forensic report.

https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1338505355463188482?s=19

That was a twitter guy who posted his synopsis of the report. The actual forensic report is linked in the first post. There's not a whole lot of departure from what twitter guy says and the findings of the actual report. Of course it'll take 5 more forensic reports from 5 different firms, reporting the same findings before people just say "it's too late anyway".

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

He states it as his last proposal. "Lowering costs and expanding health care coverage." Through the federal government? When we're trillions in debt? And do you actually think costs are going to lower? Obama promised the same thing with Obamacare, and look what's happened; you make a trip to the emergency room, and it could come out to costing thousands more dollars if the ER you go to isn't the one your insurance plan covers, not because they don't want to, but because you have taxes, costs, restrictions, and others that get passed down to customers to offset expenses from governments, be it local, state, or federal.

For example, why do game systems cost so much more in other, less fortunate countries? It ultimately comes down to the value of the currency, the real costs of customers buying the systems, games, controllers, etc., and all of the costs that come with importing the system to that country, and if the businesses selling the systems want to make money or break even on the systems, the price will reflect the value of the item on the market. It's part of the reason why a lot of Neo-Geo games like the King of Fighters has, rather infamously, a more Mexican/Brazilian fanbase along with that of whatever support it gets in Japan nowadays; Street Fighter II, and its many different versions back in the day was more expensive, and when one can get an arcade machine that one can easily swap game cartridges in and out of as opposed to how the CPS1 boards were set up (I'm pretty confident they weren't using something like the CPS Charger for CPS1 games iirc), the biggest investment is merely the arcade machines, followed by the games themselves. Companies made their money back on these machines thanks to arcade difficulty being to encourage players to keep putting coins in the machine to continue.

It's the same principal; what might be $500 in the US will be $2000 in Peru, or wherever. That's why, when people say that we have it good here in the US, they really do mean that we have it good as these systems are relatively affordable, when stock isn't dropping like a rock thanks to the supply chain being strained due to fears over a virus that has had so much misinformation about by intention and accident that it's created a situation where trust in institutions of government, especially of the more authoritarian variety, is plummeting.

Didn't you read what @AmandaRose said?

Universal Health Care is terrible especially here in Scotland where absolutely everything is 100% free.

 

[smf]

Come on people, President-elect is a term that the LEFT just made up this year.The US never ever call a person President-elect before... Remember Trump wasn't even call President until Feb 4 2017.....

Not true.

https://web.archive.org/web/2018112...t-donald-trump-election-year-hacking-i-russia

JANUARY 11, 2017
Road to the White House 2016
President-Elect Donald Trump News Conference

President-elect Donald Trump held his first news conference since July 2016 and the November election. He covered a wide range of issues,

https://web.archive.org/web/2015090...span.org/video/?283210-1/obama-speech-economy

JANUARY 8, 2009
Obama Speech on the Economy

President-Elect Barack Obama talked about the economy at the Center for the Arts of George Mason University. He said that only government could address

 

[djpannda]

Seeing how Dominion machines work may supplement what the meaning is behind these terms.

https://streamable.com/yzrypo
https://streamable.com/u7nav7


The error rate is the system's ability to process the ballots. The report gives examples how the same ballots yielded different results and determined a error rate based off of that. Adjudication is manual editing/override. Batch adjudication isn't fully explained--but it wouldn't surprise me if the software allows to mass-edits. Adjudicated ballots should have records, but in the forensic report's case, the 2020 records were missing, but not prior records.

Dominion machines connecting to the internet may allow for remote ajudication, too. I didn't dive that deep into the report.


Oh I see, you weren't even talking about the forensic report.




--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Didn't you read what @AmandaRose said?

dang ... I think Tabzer when senile.. ::::LOUD VOICE... I THINK YOU POSTED THAT ALREADY. DO HAVE SOMEONE TAKING CARE OF YOU? ::::... (Some times they forget stuff)

 

[tabzer]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?421482-1/president-elect-donald-trump-election-year-hacking-i-russia

JANUARY 11, 2017
Road to the White House 2016
President-Elect Donald Trump News Conference

President-elect Donald Trump held his first news conference since July 2016 and the November election. He covered a wide range of issues,

https://www.c-span.org/video/?283210-1/obama-speech-economy

JANUARY 8, 2009
Obama Speech on the Economy

President-Elect Barack Obama talked about the economy at the Center for the Arts of George Mason University. He said that only government could address

Yeah, it was sarcasm directed at me because he thinks I had issue with calling Biden President-elect. I don't care about that title. I understand why people were upset about calling him that when his opposition hasn't conceded, but I never took that on myself.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

dang ... I think Tabzer when senile.. ::::LOUD VOICE... I THINK YOU POSTED THAT ALREADY. DO HAVE SOMEONE TAKING CARE OF YOU? ::::... (Some times they forget stuff)

I did but @White_Raven_X took issue with me not posting it again, even though he could have traced to it via the quote-link system. He is so lazy!

 

[UltraSUPRA]

so you dont want others to wear a mask either to protect you or your family from covid? k

Looking at the survival rate, I'm willing to take my chances.

A stranger is just a friend you haven't met, there is nothing to stop you protecting each other.

I guess I'll go get some candy from that guy with the white van.

 

[djpannda]

I did but @White_Raven_X took issue with me not posting it again, even though he could have traced to it via the quote-link system. He is so lazy!

::: NOOO @White_Raven_X NOT TAKING CARE OF YOU....
(God Bless their little soul when they get like this)

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I guess I'll go get some candy from that guy with the white van.

YES Please do.....

 

[White_Raven_X]

@tabzer I've been looking into most of your posts on GBATEMP and it seems you enjoy to "stir the pot" apparently because you enjoy arguing or having people against you. I'm sorry but I will no longer entertain your waste of time and pure ignorance for information that is commonly available online regarding this particular topic. I do not support conspiracy theories neither.

 

[kingaz]

Don't be a coward. The question is: how does @AmandaRose 's stupid quote read when posted in response to that other thing you described?

You guys want to "wah wah" all the time and not be accountable for your own actions.

That's a different question, no need to get huffy just because your ability to communicate is inadequate.

AmandaRose's quote (the full quote, not the bit you cherry picked) reads like a strong refutation of the Silent_Gunner quote.

 

[tabzer]

That's a different question, no need to get huffy just because your ability to communicate is inadequate.

AmandaRose's quote (the full quote, not the bit you cherry picked) reads like a strong refutation of the Silent_Gunner quote.

It's not a different question. It was the only question presented. If you think there was a different question, I'd be happy to help you read it.

 

[smf]

I guess I'll go get some candy from that guy with the white van.

There is a middle ground. You don't have to go from one extreme to another, that isn't how rational people behave.

 

[tabzer]

@tabzer I've been looking into most of your posts on GBATEMP and it seems you enjoy to "stir the pot" apparently because you enjoy arguing or having people against you. I'm sorry but I will no longer entertain your waste of time and pure ignorance for information that is commonly available online regarding this particular topic. I do not support conspiracy theories neither.

Forensic reports are conspiracy theories?


Maybe we wouldn't be so ignorant if our sources didn't keep changing the story?

 

[kingaz]

It's not a different question. It was the only question presented. If you think there was a different question, I'd be happy to help you read it.

Let's review:

Lol. Yeah that makes it look a lot stupider but read what I posted it in response to.

Then tell me what you read from it.

The way this question reads, you were asking what I thought of the Silent_Gunner quote.

Don't be a coward. The question is: how does @AmandaRose 's stupid quote read when posted in response to that other thing you described?

You guys want to "wah wah" all the time and not be accountable for your own actions.

The way this question reads, you were asking what I thought of AmandaRose's quote in the context of the Silent_Gunner quote.

See? Two different questions.

 

[tabzer]

The way this question reads, you were asking what I thought of the Silent_Gunner quote.

Ok, I see the misunderstanding. That's not how the question reads. It=subject of contention. The subject of "it" doesn't change.

 

[djpannda]

Forensic reports are conspiracy theories?




View attachment 238308

Yes <blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="a/nHQmk1Y" data-context="false" ><a href="//imgur.com/a/nHQmk1Y"></a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[tabzer]

Yes <blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="a/nHQmk1Y" data-context="false" ><a href="//imgur.com/a/nHQmk1Y"></a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Nice!

 

[kingaz]

Ok, I see the misunderstanding. That's not how the question reads. It=subject of contention. The subject of "it" doesn't change.

So you threw a hissy fit because you were sloppy with your pronoun usage?

Well, at least you are getting closer to answering my question:

What is wrong with you?

 

[djpannda]

Nice!

sorry .. @tabzer should know how flimsy Russian propaganda is!