Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[Lacius]

The argument I made about the evidence regarding widespread voter fraud has already been addressed. Not my fault that you chose to take a leave of absence and then come back to pretend it never happened. Some might say that Trump is implicating himself as a witness, which is also a form of evidence--probably the primary form of it considering. I know that you hate that, but I cannot alter this fact for you. I'm waiting too.

If I missed your evidence of widespread voter fraud, I apologize and humbly ask that you re-post it. However, if you can't actually put up, then there's no reason for anybody to pay attention to your posts on the matter.

 

[tabzer]

Don't be lazy dude. That's just distracting. Of course I posted. What matters now is that we have a pretend showdown between Lacius and the POTUS. Lol.

 

[Lacius]

Don't be lazy dude. That's just distracting. Of course I posted.

If you have evidence of widespread voter fraud, please (re)post it. I didn't see it.

 

[tabzer]

I don't believe you. There's only 4-6 new pages of posts. Try for once.

 

[Lacius]

I don't believe you. There's only 4-6 new pages of posts. Try for once.

1. I did not see any evidence posted by you or anyone else that there was widespread voter fraud. If you are going to claim there was widespread voter fraud, you can post it now or be rightfully ignored. Anything else is a waste of time.
2. Pro-tip: When you are conversing with someone here, you should always tag them by name or directly reply to their posts. If you don't tag me or directly reply to one of my posts by hitting the reply button, I'm not going to get a notification that you responded.

 

[tabzer]

Oh no. @Lacius is going to ignore me if I don't post my wall of text quoting him and addressing point by point. If you want the distraction, you can feel free to repost whatever you think is my latest relevent post, and we can rehash it. Forgive me if I don't want to be the one that walks an extra mile for you.

 

[SonowRaevius]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54874120

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-g...theyre-quite-alive-despite-false-fraud-claims

Another blow to the trump case, the voters he said were dead in Michigan....were actually alive this whole time and are well.....

 

[Lacius]

Oh no. @Lacius is going to ignore me if I don't post my wall of text quoting him and addressing point by point. If you want the distraction, you can feel free to repost whatever you think is my latest relevent post, and we can rehash it. Forgive me if I don't want to be the one that walks an extra mile for you.

The only thing I asked for was evidence of widespread voter fraud, not a "wall of text quoting him and addressing point by point." Try again.

 

[tabzer]

You are asking me to "repost". Beggars can't be choosers.

 

[Deleted User]

You are asking me to "repost". Beggars can't be choosers.

Remember how you asked if I was attacking your character when I made the statement about you guys not listening to evidence?
Yeah... at this point I'll let it be an attack on your character.
We've already told you, shown you, used evidence from courts, that there is no voter fraud. We've provided our sources. We've provided arguments.
Now here you are just wanting to make a statement, without any evidence, and then when someone asks you for evidence, you side step the issue and attack the person.
When lacius asks you to "put up or shut up"
We are strictly asking for evidence to your claims, evidence that is irrefutable or at least strong. That doesn't have some significant issue or extreme leaning.
If it comes from something like idk
Project vertias or beritbart. When they have a long track record of either having extremist views and along with not being factual. We write that evidence off. Because that source, is extremely sketchy. TO prevent problems since I don't know if you can natively use English or you use google translate. Replace sketchy with questionable.
Sources we often use, are as least extreme as possible and has a high reputation of accurately reporting things.

 

[Joom]

Now here you are just wanting to make a statement, without any evidence, and then when someone asks you for evidence, you side step the issue and attack the person.

You're arguing with someone who tried to defend pedophilia. I don't think you're gonna have any luck in your endeavors.

 

[Deleted User]

You're arguing with someone who tried to defend pedophilia. I don't think you're gonna have any luck in your endeavors.

yiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiikes
didn't see that....
been off and on the forms, been balancing a lot of life stuff recently.


edit:
Correction, no I saw it, I just must of forgot that it happened/the discussion of it. Was likely focused on a different discussion
still that's a big yikes

 

[Lacius]

You're arguing with someone who tried to defend pedophilia. I don't think you're gonna have any luck in your endeavors.

He did what?

 

[gregory-samba]

It's sort of weird how the Left can claim there was no voter fraud before all of the votes are even counted. Their media tells them there's none so there must not be any! LOL!

 

[Joom]

He did what?

Yeah, we got on the subject of the Giuliani scene from the new Borat movie, and he was like "if an old man wants to have sex with a 15 year old, we should let that pass because he's probably not getting any anyway".

It's sort of weird how the Left can claim there was no voter fraud before all of the votes are even counted. Their media tells them there's none so there must not be any! LOL!

You do know we're past this, right? It's like I said about you conservatives; you think the media makes everyone's decisions because it's what controls yours. We don't have to listen to the media when court records, and even statements from the Republican party, contradict any claim of voter fraud. The Republican party even admitted they know no fraud took place, but they're rallying behind the notion to keep the ignorant base riled up so they can possibly win the Senate in January. They're worried that if they admit defeat, Republican voters will be too depressed to show up to vote. They're causing literal harm to US democracy just so they can retain power. In short, you're a dupe and a fool.

 

[KingVamp]

It's sort of weird how the Left can claim there was no voter fraud before all of the votes are even counted. Their media tells them there's none so there must not be any! LOL!

But claiming widespread voter fraud with no evidence before all the votes are even in is fine, right?

 

[Lacius]

Yeah, we got on the subject of the Giuliani scene from the new Borat movie, and he was like "if an old man wants to have sex with a 15 year old, we should let that pass because he's probably not getting any anyway".


You do know we're past this, right? It's like I said about you conservatives; you think the media makes everyone's decisions because it's what controls yours. We don't have to listen to the media when court records, and even statements from the Republican party, contradict any claim of voter fraud. The Republican party even admitted they know no fraud took place, but they're rallying behind the notion to keep the ignorant base riled up so they can possibly win the Senate in January. They're worried that if they admit defeat, Republican voters will be too depressed to show up to vote. They're causing literal harm to US democracy just so they can retain power. In short, you're a dupe and a fool.

I guess we already knew that they'll defend anything.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

It's sort of weird how the Left can claim there was no voter fraud before all of the votes are even counted. Their media tells them there's none so there must not be any! LOL!

There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud, whether or not the votes have all been counted (and they largely have been at this point). It's a grand mistake to claim there is voter fraud in the absence of evidence of voter fraud.

I'm sorry the facts are inconvenient for what your side has embarrassingly become.

 

[SG854]

For some reason I get @Joom and @Jayro confused. I sometimes think they're the same person.

 

[0x3000027E]

There's no evidence of widespread voter fraud

Certainly, however the current administration has to put forth every effort to maintain the presidency, even if that means throwing conjecture into the wind. They owe it to the donors that invested in the campaign

 

[Lacius]

Certainly, however the current administration has to put forth every effort to maintain the presidency, even if that means throwing conjecture into the wind. They owe it to the donors that invested in the campaign

They don't owe anybody an attempt to dismantle democracy.