The article should probably be updated then, because the "History" section contradicts this. Either that, or the section you quoted is overly generalizing, because every other source I'm checking only mentions section 215. This only applies to surveillance, and not the whole act, or what it enables the federal government to do when they determine someone to be a terrorist, or what they can do when they deem something a national threat.no u
(Yeah, "no u" was probably the worst thing to say in a serious political discussion.)
Do you think actual criminals who are involved in such activity leave a browser history trail? This does absolutely nothing to stop terrorism. Also, weren't you the one preaching about not sacrificing liberty for security? Hypocritical much?This is to protect people from terrorists and any sort of online Mafia. But I guess a sickness is more dangerous than organized murderers.
Last edited by Joom,