You are asking me to "repost". Beggars can't be choosers.
Remember how you asked if I was attacking your character when I made the statement about you guys not listening to evidence?
Yeah... at this point I'll let it be an attack on your character.
We've already told you, shown you, used evidence from courts, that there is no voter fraud. We've provided our sources. We've provided arguments.
Now here you are just wanting to make a statement, without any evidence, and then when someone asks you for evidence, you side step the issue and attack the person.
When lacius asks you to "put up or shut up"
We are strictly asking for evidence to your claims, evidence that is irrefutable or at least strong. That doesn't have some significant issue or extreme leaning.
If it comes from something like idk
Project vertias or beritbart. When they have a long track record of either having extremist views and along with not being factual. We write that evidence off. Because that source, is extremely sketchy. TO prevent problems since I don't know if you can natively use English or you use google translate. Replace sketchy with questionable.
Sources we often use, are as least extreme as possible and has a high reputation of accurately reporting things.