How do these banners look on the real hardware? If there are any problems with their appearance, I can make necessary changes.
Aaand GBAtemp is back online. Wow, what a wait.
I only had a chance with using your pictures for SNES9X. The provided HOME Menu banner had fuzzy edges due to transparent pixels. These were deleted or replaced with the solid purple color. Also, the app's alternative background image was acting funny with 3D mode. I found out it needed to be converted to Index format like the original. These corrections were done through Photoshop.
Another hurdle I would like to tackle is replacing the splash screen with a matching purple one (see the tinge hue). There's another user who shared his modified logoLZ.bin a while back for me to look at, but it doesn't work due to some mismatch encryption or build error. I've been trying to decompile, debug, and recompile it but can't fix it as my technical knowledge in 3DS logo is poor. This is how it looks in Every File Explorer. If it's ever fixed, I'm not sure it can be used because it might fall outside the gray area of fair use...
Next, there's the issue with the blue bottom menu clashing with the thematic purple tone. I think I found the lines of codes that controls the bottom background colors in a source code file called
3dsmenu.cpp . The section of interesting is as shown:
(I believe)* the two color codings of
0x1976D2 specify those top & bottom bars as blue. If this is correct, all one needs to do is change it to
0x6B56DF to make it look like this:
Lastly, I'm having problems trying to compile Snes9x_3ds from source code because the required specific versions of the libraries and build environment are next to impossible to find [
devkitARM r45 ,
libctru v1.0.0 ,
citro3d v1.0.0 ]. Latest releases are devkiARM r49?? , libctru v1.5.0 , and citro3d v1.4.0, and these trio are not compatible doing a test run "make" command. Tsk.
Final words: I rather not share this re-stylized build of snes9x_3ds in a half-baked state. Even though open source allows you to do what you want with authors' projects (as long as you follow their license terms) *, I would like explicit consent from all involving parties should this proposed build pushes forward.