*UNLESS the content creator gives you express permissionit's illegal to download mp3s and mp4s from youtube though as so damages the autors(yeah like if they were damaged anyways)
*UNLESS the content creator gives you express permissionit's illegal to download mp3s and mp4s from youtube though as so damages the autors(yeah like if they were damaged anyways)
Murder laws are invalid. They infringe upon my right to freely express myselfCopyright laws are invalid, they are arbitrary and they are violations of my freedom of speech and property rights. Copying is not theft.
Good Friend xDMy friend just blocked me for emulating o-o
-Cough- YouTube -Cough-Copyright laws are invalid, they are arbitrary and they are violations of my freedom of speech and property rights. Copying is not theft.
Murder violates another persons property (their own body) me copying a sequence of 1's and 0's in my own home does not infringe on anyone's rights, nor does it deprive anything from anyone else.Murder laws are invalid. They infringe upon my right to freely express myself
Actually yes, Yes it does. Those 1's and 0's are your bank account number. Your name. Your nudes. Your everything. People don't understand binary neither would they care. Yet just to point out that those 1's and 0's are your everything xDMurder violates another persons property (their own body) me copying a sequence of 1's and 0's in my own home does not infringe on anyone's rights, nor does it deprive anything from anyone else.
If I use my own ink, and my own paper, and copy the words from a book; have I deprived the original owner of anything? Of course I have not. To say that "No, you cannot write down those words, because someone has written them down before you" is a violation of my property rights.
Actually yes, Yes it does. Those 1's and 0's are your bank account number. Your name. Your nudes. Your everything. People don't understand binary neither would they care. Yet just to point out that those 1's and 0's are your everything xD
Yes but you're copying their thoughts. Which in turn means you're copying their work. They own it. They deal with the contents them selves.If someone copies my SSN, then they are impersonating me and committing fraud; this violates my property rights.
If I copy a book with my own ink and paper, I am neither depriving the creator from their copy, nor am I taking anything from anyone else.
Yes but you're copying their thoughts. Which in turn means you're copying their work. They own it. They deal with the contents them selves.
If they publish an idea then yes, they do own it. And you have to sight the source in a bibliography. Or you can face a hefty fine and even be expelled from your school!"they own it" no, they don't. You cannot own an idea. However, to say that I can't do whatever I want with my own property (assuming it doesn't violate someone else's rights) is saying that you are a co-owner of my property and can tell me what I can and cannot do with it.
Agreed.It's all corporate greed companies push out garbage that actually profit off the brainwashed. Plus they keep jacking up the prices of everything. Some Movies & Games do deserve the money for their hard work but at the same time don't make everything too limited like limited edition game because the scalping does encourage pirating companies should learn this lesson. Companies should be held responsible for promoting garbage.
So, according to your logic, Richard Dawkins owns the word "meme" since he first published it in his book. And he has a right to prevent us from using this word? Does he have a right to extort money out of us from using it? For what period of time? What are the conditions?If they publish an idea then yes, they do own it. And you have to sight the source in a bibliography. Or you can face a hefty fine and even be expelled from your school!
Well duh ofcourse not. That's logic. But a scientific discovery that was published in a book should never be sighted by anyone. And the person who discovered it was useless and didn't find it xDSo, according to your logic, Richard Dawkins owns the word "meme" since he first published it in his book. And he has a right to prevent us from using this word? Does he have a right to extort money out of us from using it? For what period of time? What are the conditions?
Do you see how arbitrary all of this is? All of the above are not hypotheticals, I want to hear your answers.
Devs need to eat too.There are a lot of posts on this and varying opinions.
Myself I believe that media should be free and available to everyone so it can be enjoyed by all people regardless of their financial status or ability to buy it. Knowledge to the people is power and removing said knowledge via censorship and laws is weakening said knowledge towards the people...
Especially with people that don't get basic copyright laws and regulationsAre we doing this again? Didn't we get nowhere last time this came up ( http://gbatemp.net/threads/nintendo...for-new-controller.424200/page-2#post-6289660 ), albeit more for patents.
xD happen to agree.Devs need to eat too.
I certainly wouldn't take time out of my day to work on something for free. The world doesn't work like that.
So scientific discoveries aren't owned, but patterns of words can be owned? Please tell me more about your arbitrary rules, and your justifications for them.Well duh ofcourse not. That's logic. But a scientific discovery that was published in a book should never be sighted by anyone. And the person who discovered it was useless and didn't find it xD
ALSO 999 POSTS