Alrighty then... I got one of those fancy responses from them, too...
Let the wait continue
Let the wait continue
afaik most games will default to the main language (in most cases English), but i remember reading that some games will default to a different language i.e French/Spanish if played on a Japanese console, afaik there is no way to change the language on most games as its set by the system, but some games let you choose the language in game like pokemon
tually, the last build date is 10 minutes ago. Cross your fingers, guys.Do you remember that I setup push notifications for any change of the lastBuildDate of their RSS Feed? Well… It changed 3 times within the last hour. The last time at 12:42 GMT+1.
That timestamp actually changes if they do anything in wordpress. Maybe they are currently writing the post for 3.0
Get it from good ol' Australia.So buying new 3ds jap is not so convenient...
Owh I wouldnt know but I guess thats not a problem since the video shows us devmenu and a .cia game.
*looks around warily*
*psst*
I've got something here......
*looks around warily*
Go to 13.14 of this video.....
I guarantee.....you'll not be disappointed.....
Guys.
NEVER GIVE UP!
BROTHER!Yet another reason why I must wait for Gateway and its region unlocking goodness...
Seriously gateway? Seriously?The release of our new firmware supporting SysNand up to 9.2 will be within a
few days.
There's nothing new here and there's no need for speculation. To install devmenu you need emunand.I do not know either, but i am sure another spoofing mechanic system need to setup for it to be able to update the spoofed system to the latest firmware and to be able to play new games. They might name it differently, but the idea should be the same.
If they do not manage to do that, then it will be just like the period of firmware 4.0-4.5 without emuNAND.
People with 3ds on firmware beyond 4.5 should hope for the former, or they are screwed till another exploit is found.
Ok i think i got a different response mail back:
Around new year
The only part that is liable for legal action is what in the EULA is a copy of an existing right as appointed by law.
For example if I sell you a bike and when you go home you find an EULA attacked on it that state "You can't call be me beautiful . You can't shoot me in the face" the EULA itself is worthless (and you can call me beautiful ) but at the same time if you shoot me in the face you will be punished according to law (if they found you).
That's because law, not EULA.
So yes, big company have rights and they can enforce them, but they are defined buy the existing laws, not the EULA.
The 31st or the 1st sounds about right.Ok i think i got a different response mail back:
Around new year