I'm fairly sure that was just a normal pissed user and not an ex-staffer.I thought they were removed becuase a ex staff member used it to exploit the site, caused everyone sig to turn into yugioh or something
I'm fairly sure that was just a normal pissed user and not an ex-staffer.I thought they were removed becuase a ex staff member used it to exploit the site, caused everyone sig to turn into yugioh or something
Me too.I hope not. I quite enjoyed your "Rydian's Crazy Quote" sig you had going on a while back.
That was an original concern, yeah (along with gathering visitor IP addresses, but having a script with a static output and normal extension via mod_rewrite can do that anyways without setting off any flags, and knowing visitor-presented IP addresses isn't a security concern since every site you visit has that information anyways and it's not publicly tied to a single human).Aren't they banned because it could say something offensive to one person, but when a staff member views it it can say something different?
I don't mind giving the source out, but with dynamic signatures there's no guarantee that the source being given is actually the source used, as the viewer only has the script's output to judge on (opposed to locally-run programs where you have a copy of the entire compiled thing, not just the output), which was likely the concern.I think allowing something like that to exist should be allowed but under the condition of making the source public. That way there's no question as to what your signature could possibly contain.
I'm fairly sure that was just a normal pissed user and not an ex-staffer.I thought they were removed becuase a ex staff member used it to exploit the site, caused everyone sig to turn into yugioh or something
Wasn't it JPH? Wasn't he a member of staff? Maybe I'm wrong.