Haven't heard of that one before. Gonna look into it more but at first glance, it does look good.TotalJustice is a good egg and sphaira probably does everything goldleaf does, but better, tbh
Haven't heard of that one before. Gonna look into it more but at first glance, it does look good.TotalJustice is a good egg and sphaira probably does everything goldleaf does, but better, tbh
I will test by installing some game, I use sys-patch.
+1I will test by installing some game, I use sys-patch.
Edit: installed normally, I use the DBI.810.en.nro version
Idiots who know nothing posting on that sub began a long time ago.
DBI dumps version.txt only when user selects menu item. No auto action. And for update check only item specified in config is used.Does DBI dumps and uses version.txt from the firmware or from the official servers by default if the specified url can't be reached or no local file is found or if found is outdated? I mean, does it checks all the sources for the latest updates (including firmware and official servers) or it only takes into account the first working source it finds?
Are you bricking switches or not?DBI dumps version.txt only when user selects menu item. No auto action. And for update check only item specified in config is used.
I don't know anyone who has been bricked by DBI.Are you bricking switches or not?
People were still using SX OS even though for some time it had brick code, so I wouldn't be so sure.It would certainly not be beneficial for the DBI developer if it became known that this tool bricks consoles. Then no one would use this tool anymore!
Unlike SX OS, which is no longer supported, DBI is still being developed. I don't think version 810 will be the last version of DBI to be released. What do you say, @duckbill007?People were still using SX OS even though for some time it had brick code, so I wouldn't be so sure.
Well him stating versions after 486 has brickcode or malware is not helping his reputation. So it's rightful that users of DBI should be worried that it might brick their system.It would certainly not be beneficial for the DBI developer if it became known that this tool bricks consoles. Then no one would use this tool anymore!
That's all just theory. In practice, however, nothing has happened in this regard yet. Word would spread like wildfire if it did.Well him stating versions after 486 has brickcode or malware is not helping his reputation. So it's rightful that users of DBI should be worried that it might brick their system.
I absolutely don't care if dbi is used or not. I do it for myself only.Then no one would use this tool anymore!
I do not understand what are you talking about? There were some zhcn versions of dbi that was stopped to build after 647 version because of Roasted duck request. Translation was made by him and I build versions with that translation.About half year after the release of the allegedly "Stribog and RSA4096 protected" 490.
I absolutely don't care if dbi is used or not. I do it for myself only.
Post automatically merged:
I do not understand what are you talking about? There were some zhcn versions of dbi that was stopped to build after 647 version because of Roasted duck request. Translation was made by him and I build versions with that translation.
As for 806 in your link it is just a blob replace.
So? What else method do you expect? Or do you think there is two set of strings?Quickly checked it and it appears to use the same, obvious, method of translating as the one I shared.
And how does existence of chineese version prooves anything? If they removed protection - good for them, if not - bad for them. In both cases I do not care.DBI file integrity protection
So? What else method do you expect? Or do you think there is two set of strings?
Lol, no.Guys, I think Rashevsky and Duckbill are the same person.
