DBIPatcher for traslate v810 russian version

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoodmanBCN
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 19,364
  • Replies Replies 161
  • Likes Likes 14
Does DBI dumps and uses version.txt from the firmware or from the official servers by default if the specified url can't be reached or no local file is found or if found is outdated? I mean, does it checks all the sources for the latest updates (including firmware and official servers) or it only takes into account the first working source it finds?
DBI dumps version.txt only when user selects menu item. No auto action. And for update check only item specified in config is used.
 
It would certainly not be beneficial for the DBI developer if it became known that this tool bricks consoles. Then no one would use this tool anymore!
 
  • Like
Reactions: djnate27
People were still using SX OS even though for some time it had brick code, so I wouldn't be so sure.
Unlike SX OS, which is no longer supported, DBI is still being developed. I don't think version 810 will be the last version of DBI to be released. What do you say, @duckbill007?
 
Last edited by Muxi,
It would certainly not be beneficial for the DBI developer if it became known that this tool bricks consoles. Then no one would use this tool anymore!
Well him stating versions after 486 has brickcode or malware is not helping his reputation. So it's rightful that users of DBI should be worried that it might brick their system.
 
Well him stating versions after 486 has brickcode or malware is not helping his reputation. So it's rightful that users of DBI should be worried that it might brick their system.
That's all just theory. In practice, however, nothing has happened in this regard yet. Word would spread like wildfire if it did.
 
Anyway, was searching for possible issues and found this (honestly funny, seems to be all about roasted ducks :D) article.

https://shipengliang.com/games/端午节儿童节礼物:全球首发-dbi-中文版.html

There is huge poster attached, apparently of some drama concerning this roasted duck guy. If it is to be trusted, it appears that Андрей Комаровских (apparently duckbill, or someone impersonating him), told those chinese guys to just patch the nro themselves. About half year after the release of the allegedly "Stribog and RSA4096 protected" 490.

Honestly, think its gonna be fine, so lets just stop the drama for now. :D

edit: Just so clarify, without further spamming.

The mood of his reply to Chinese translation of the binary is quite different than to possible english translation (despite him being obviously annoyed by the situation) and most importantly, does not mention any drm at all.

So, I call him bluff on it.
 
Last edited by Morce3232,
  • Like
Reactions: GoodmanBCN
Then no one would use this tool anymore!
I absolutely don't care if dbi is used or not. I do it for myself only.
Post automatically merged:

About half year after the release of the allegedly "Stribog and RSA4096 protected" 490.
I do not understand what are you talking about? There were some zhcn versions of dbi that was stopped to build after 647 version because of Roasted duck request. Translation was made by him and I build versions with that translation.

As for 806 in your link it is just a blob replace.
 
Last edited by duckbill007,
I absolutely don't care if dbi is used or not. I do it for myself only.
Post automatically merged:


I do not understand what are you talking about? There were some zhcn versions of dbi that was stopped to build after 647 version because of Roasted duck request. Translation was made by him and I build versions with that translation.

As for 806 in your link it is just a blob replace.

Well, there is mention of some kind of convoluted DBI file integrity protection in rashevsky's github. If you did not say that, than there obviously is no issue at all. 🤷

Quickly checked it and it appears to use the same, obvious, method of translating as the one I shared.
 
Quickly checked it and it appears to use the same, obvious, method of translating as the one I shared.
So? What else method do you expect? Or do you think there is two set of strings?

DBI file integrity protection
And how does existence of chineese version prooves anything? If they removed protection - good for them, if not - bad for them. In both cases I do not care.
 
Okay, whatever I guess.

Seemed like nice way to get rid of the negative energy which you seemingly accumulated.

Maybe it's the language barrier?

edit: Wow, that might actually be it. You could try using one of the AI agents to get better grasp on the implicit meaning and overall mood of posts. I honestly mean it.

edit2:

So? What else method do you expect? Or do you think there is two set of strings?

Now that you mention it, I have come across another version, 801 I think, supposedly in English, which funnily had both Russian language payload and plaintext English strings.

I have neither run it, nor analysed further (and don't have 'clean' 801), yet it certainly is a bit strange. :)
 
Last edited by Morce3232,

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum