Oh and BTW pros and cons:
Arm9loaderhax:
+everything from sysnand
+custom recovery
+who needs hardmods?
+anti-update protection for fools who update junk
+eaiser on the SD card
+free stuffs
+custom themes
+save dumps/editors
+no button combos on startup unless you need something specific
+can be used without SD
+100℅ cfw bootrate
-can be a bit of a pain for a noob to set up
-otp less causes random bricks (but it was removed from the guide, so to be fair this one shouldn't count)
-sometimes you need to wait for FW support
Emunand:
+free stuffs
+custom themes
+emulated nand, so its great for development purposes
+can fk this up all you like, and nothing will happen
+eaiser to use with GW
+bit simpler to set up
+will always support latest FW, so long as your cfw does
-harder on the SD, shortening its total life
-can't really be used if your SD is lower then 16gb
-can brick or update sysnand if you don't update properly
-only 100% boot rate if its booted one way, any other is like 80%
-have to boot homebrew in order to access it
-because of kernel permissions needed, must be on 10.7 or less to boot it
-not really recommended anymore due to the fact that everything that almost any feature available on this, is also on a9lh
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Thanks for providing 0 constructive feedback to the conversation. And no, this is not a flame ware. It's a simple question regarding emu/rednand. No need to make everything a flame war.
Well dang, was writing above during this post. Give a guy 5 minuets XD