Yes it is.It's not a debate moderators job to do fact checks.
Yes it is.It's not a debate moderators job to do fact checks.
Yes it is.No it isn't.
None of what you just said involves fact checking things the debators say. I've watched plenty of debates. There's never fact checking. Stop it.Yes it is.
Moderator Encyclopedia definition: someone who moderates a meeting or discussion
Moderating Encyclopedia definition: avoiding behavior that goes beyond what is normal, healthy, or acceptable, to guide a discussion or direct a meeting that involves a group of people
only liars think it is healthy or acceptable to lie and thus object to fact checking
Ah so you've watched shouting competitions between liars ayeI've watched plenty of debates. There's never fact checking.
Yes it doesNone of what you just said involves fact checking things the debators say
No u.Stop it.
It's not a debate moderators job to do fact checks.
Only notorious liars are afraid of the truth.OMG... he actually said, and I quote, "The rules were that you guys weren't going to fact-check."
View attachment 462193
what do you think a moderator doesIt's not a debate moderators job to do fact checks.
Lets be honest, nobody actually cares what anyone does or who has a better policy. Its just all pro wrestling style promotion and "promos" that people care about. Think im wrong? What do people talk about more, what Trump said about dogs or how close a world war seemingly is?Don't get how this is a slam dunk on Walz. He basically said he's not perfect and can make mistakes, but he does understand and have seen tensions rise while in Hong Kong before the tragedy happened.
Plus, he's given plenty of great examples, especially about the state of Minnesota being one of the safest and productive states in US. He's already shown very good results in his own state and the people properly voted for him for several years. He has the skills and experience to properly work in office without spouting random bullshit. And he's reminding people of Harris's campaign plans and goals to give to the people by jumpstarting new small businesses, childcare, more housings, etc.
J.D. Vance on the other hand barely spoke about policies. All he did was fluff up his "answers" to seem like they are "something", but when you peel off the cover, it's really a whole lot of nothing burger and all it boils down to him is to "bring back common sense", which very ironic because Trump is the opposite of common sense and Vance doesn't have any either, especially when he wrongfully blames immigrants for issues they haven't committed (like them buying up houses when many of them came here poor or smuggling in fentanyl???). That ain't common sense, that's just outright making up lies and conspiracy theories.
LMAO yikes it was that bad
Having plenty of laid out plans and policies does make a big difference. The people that are watching want to know what each candidate plans to do when they get into office and try. Harris/Walz have given clear and understandable plans to give to the people, while Trump/Vance only have "concepts" of plans and sound half-baked and keep changing constantly to make them viewed more favorably while also showing their racism and incorrectly blaming innocent immigrants.Lets be honest, nobody actually cares what anyone does or who has a better policy. Its just all pro wrestling style promotion and "promos" that people care about. Think im wrong? What do people talk about more, what Trump said about dogs or how close a world war seemingly is?