


Generally speaking, AI disclosure isn't about telling people in detail how a project is coded under the hood. It's more like saying ‘Hey, I probably don't understand how exactly this works, code quality is likely poor, and I don't plan on maintaining it well – or at all. It seems to work, but use at your own risk.’LOL, no. By that sense, we need specific "BASIC Coded", "C Coded", "ASM Coded", "Read it in a book some place Coded" "Googled it Coded" etc.

A disclaimer I should have an everything I hand coded over the past 30 years. Literally 10 minutes after coding something I have forgot what the hell I was thinking. Go on, ask me how DSision2 or DiagnoSe works...Generally speaking, AI disclosure isn't about telling people in detail how a project is coded under the hood. It's more like saying ‘Hey, I probably don't understand how exactly this works, code quality is likely poor, and I don't plan on maintaining it well – or at all. It seems to work, but use at your own risk.’
Really no different from coding by googling what you want to do and copying the first stackoverflow result in that sense.Generally speaking, AI disclosure isn't about telling people in detail how a project is coded under the hood. It's more like saying ‘Hey, I probably don't understand how exactly this works, code quality is likely poor, and I don't plan on maintaining it well – or at all. It seems to work, but use at your own risk.’

I also use AI for coding (although I do have programming fundamentals myself, so It's not entirely a blind run, and I also check if whatever It's spitting makes sense) but since the entry bar for homebrews has become quite low in general It's good to have a rule that shows a product that is at least 70% done or with a release. As time goes on the risk of seeing this forum flooded with projects that don't reach a playable stage is pretty high, given how good AI is turning at coding.Wouldn't it be better and more humane if we just instabanned "developers" that post that shit?
I mean I think it would win a poll here.
Honestly an AI disclosure per release rules is good. But that may turn everything into a witch hunt where someone may deny that they used AI and then someone else will point out the opposite either for spite or because they lied to begin with.Would people use it, though? Also, a more general ‘AI-assisted’ prefix would be preferable IMO, so that it covers more than just coding.
Maybe best to put this in site suggestions.
Not sure it will fly tho as previously mentioned, not all devs are full time super qualified experts at every code or tool used so it would mean a prefix for everything.
Maybe, just a disclaimer about how something was developed is really upto the dev themselves but why does it matter except for vibephobes?
If it works, it works...

